NOTE: The problem asks to cut the board into 10 equal parts, not into equal boards proportional to the original piece of wood.
Case 1: CANNOT stack wood on top of each other.
Assume the board 5 feet by 2 feet. If you made one horizontal cut in the center of the board 1 foot from each edge, and then made four vertical cuts at 1 foot apart, you would then have 10 equal pieces at 1' by 1' each. Time taken: 5 minutes for 5 cuts.
Case 2: CAN stack wood on top of each other.
The board is 5 feet by 2 feet. Cut the board long way 1 foot from the middle and the result is 2 boards 5 feet by 1 foot. Stack these two boards on top of each other. Then, cut the stack vertically one foot from the end now making 2 pieces of wood 1' by 1' and 2 pieces of wood 4' by 1'. Then, take the 2 pieces of wood 4' by 1' and stack them on top of each other. Cut vertically once in half, so you now result in 4 boards 2' by 1'. Finally, stack these 4 pieces of wood on top of each other. Cut once vertically and you now have 8 pieces of wood 1' by 1' (plus the 2 from earlier which now make 10). Time taken: 4 minutes for 4 cuts.
I guess it is a bisector i mean im the one asking the question so i guess it is bisector.
20 minutes. It only takes 4 cuts to make 5 equal-sized pieces.
How you say equal in Latin is "aequus", or you could even say "par" to say equal in Latin.
the root par means equal or equal to depending on the word. This is like in golf when you get a par. means equal to the average.
parilis, or par mean "equal".
Cutting them in half.
Yes. Cutting each paper into 3 equal size pieces gives 15 pieces of paper. Each student gets one piece and there are 3 left over. Cutting the 3 leftover pieces each into 4 equal size pieces gives 12 pieces of paper, one for each student. (1/3 + 1/12) x 12 = 5
nine minutes
Yes, but they will intersect at a point halfway across the diameter. It would be like cutting a pizza into twelve equal pieces.
Not without cutting up a few of the 100 into 3 equal pieces each.
take the square and cut it into equal (pretty thin) rectangles\\for like a five inch square:put a ruler next to the square and cut in on the first one inch line.keep cutting in till you have 5 equal pieces
If there were 10 minutes in an hour, then you could only split an hour into 2 or 5 equal pieces without cutting up any minutes. With 60 minutes in an hour, you can split an hour into 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, or 30 equal pieces, without cutting up any minutes.
A person could always purchase separate sticks of candy rather than trying to divide a stick into equal pieces. A person could also use a ruler or a scale after cutting the candy stick to make sure all pieces are equal.
The best way to divide a square cake into 6 pieces would to first cut the cake in half (creating 2 pieces) and cutting each of those 2 pieces into thirds (creating 6 pieces).
Chromosomes start to be pulled tot the sides of the cell in equal numbers and a thin wall starts to form in the middle of the cell cutting into 2 pieces.
This is a trick question. Normally if you wanted to cut a cake into 8 equal pieces you would do so with more than 3 cuts. However, it is possible to do it in 3 cuts if you have a sufficiently long knife. By cutting the cake with two perpendicular cuts you can easily get 4 equal pieces. Then you rearrange these 4 pieces so that they are in a line, with all the pointy ends aligned in the same direction. Then you can cut all four pieces in half with one more cut. But it takes a long knife.Answer:Alternately two perpendicular cuts to make 4 equal pieces and a horizontal cut at the middle of the cake to make it into two equal layers each with 4 equal pieces.But if the cake has frosting on top, then the top pieces can't really be exactly equal to the bottom pieces which won't have frosting on top. Nonetheless, it's a good alternative. And not all cakes are frosted.
23 minutes