kelvin klin
The corporation name should be used as the company name.
A socially responsible investor would typically avoid supporting companies involved in activities such as tobacco production, firearms manufacturing, or fossil fuel extraction, as these industries may conflict with ethical or sustainability values. Instead, they would prefer companies that prioritize environmental sustainability, social equity, and ethical governance. Therefore, a company that engages in harmful practices, such as those listed, would not align with the principles of socially responsible investing.
It means the company name is a registered trademark.
Yes, a company name is a proper noun. A proper noun is the name of a specific person, place, or thing. A company is a thing.
There are many corporations that may not be socially responsible for a moment. Wells Fargo and other banking institutions wasn't socially responsible when they mismanaged mortgages in 2008.
Bp
Social irresponsible
They pollute the environment.. 1) they let harmul chemicals in water 2) they emit harmful chemicals in the air....
A socially responsible consumer might boycott a company that uses child labor.
The employees are a part of a company's being socially responsible because they reflect the face of its employer.
Socially responsible companies use renewable resources.
Benefits clearly outnumbers risks on this one. With many diseases the child will be handicapped for life or not even survive so yes, then you are irresponsible. Getting serious side effects from vaccines are very rare.
No! A company should pay the market wage required to attract and keep the people it needs to do the necessary work. That is the answer you would get from a socially irresponsible company, driving people to socialism, whis is an even worse response. The correct answer is Yes! The market is the best yardstick for the price of goods and services, it does not apply to human beings.
yes
Yes, if the company is socially sporting.
As a blanket statement, no, quite the opposite. It would be irresponsible to not have a company owe up to their responsibilities simply because they are a giant corporation. It would also be irresponsible to not hold the responsible parties to their responsibilities.
how would the internet company benefit from acting socially responsible