A non-standard purchase order is a purchase order that is used when payment must be immediately submitted. This is often used for travel expenses or registrations for conferences.
The contracting officer can terminate a commercial purchase order for cause:
purchase order
Irrevocable corporate purchase order
A LIMIT ORDER, also known as an "OR BETTER" order is a type of buy or sell order. It is a very commonly used Order Type. A Limit Orders key feature is that you are NOT guaranteed a fill, but if filled you are guaranteed a price. For example, you might place an order to BUY IBM at "$25 or better", (You can also say Buy IBM at $25Limit, it means the same thing). You are instructing the broker to BUY you IBM at a price of $25 or less. Note that if IBM never trades 25 your order will be canceled at the end of the day*. On the Sell side, "Or better" is more. So for example, Sell IBM at $25LIMIT means get me $25 or more. So you will wind up with $25 or more IF you are filled, but if the opportunity does not occur in the market that day, the order will be canceled at the days end* and you will still have your IBM. *All orders are DAY ORDERS, meaning one day, unless otherwise specified. The most common specification is the acronym GTC (Good 'til Canceled.)
You need to read the terms of service before signing any contract or putting down a deposit. Probably depends on what you are purchasing. For high dollar purchase, a purchase might be a custom order, and if the order was canceled, it might be subject to restocking fees.
H
thats a training of unilateral
yes
unilateral contract
Removal of one tube (unilateral salpingectomy
unilateral
'Unilateral' starts with a 'you' sound, so that would be 'a unilateral' or 'a united' . . . But if the 'u' is not a diphthong you use 'an', for example 'an unlocked door'.
A warrant is canceled on the order of a judge.
no and no
Unilateral YES. Bilateral NO
US President Harry Truman once used the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 as an example of unilateral presidential authority and initiative. He even had some support from "constitutional" attorneys in the Justice Department to support him. Most constitutional scholars, however, did not see the Louisiana Purchase in that light at all. The US Congress made an objection to Jefferson's acts and to solidify its stance confirmed the envoys who negotiated the purchase, appropriated the funds for the purchase, ratified and ratified the treaty confirming the purchase.