Depends on the amount of electrical energy they (need to) generate.
How much does the average nuclear plant generate ?
How much does the average coal plant generate ?
To arrange 19 plants in 9 rows with 5 plants in each row, you would need to place 8 rows with 5 plants each, and 1 row with 4 plants. This would total 8 rows x 5 plants = 40 plants, plus the remaining 4 plants in the 9th row, giving you a total of 44 plants. Therefore, it is not possible to arrange 19 plants in 9 rows with 5 plants in each row without having some rows with less than 5 plants.
they would treat the other castes poorly
The density of oxygen.The efficiency of the nuclear fission process.The density of carbon.
I would like to hear your description in other words, please. In other words, a more succinct description would be most appreciated.
If this for triangle then the other angle would be 32o Sum of interior angles of a triangle = 180o Therefore your question would be 180 - (112 + 36) = This would equal the other angle
It varies depending on the capacity of each power plant, but generally speaking, one nuclear power plant can replace multiple coal-fired power plants due to the higher energy output of nuclear energy.
No it is impossible they would explode
There would be no nuclear power plants.
Yes.!
11 reactors at present, but see the link below
Nuclear power plants have extremely tight security. More to the point, however, WikiAnswers will not provide information about illegal, terrorist activities.
Most countries that have sufficiently advanced science and engineering background do already have some nuclear power plants. Exceptions I can think of are Australia and New Zealand, and there it is because there are other types of fuel available and popular opinion is anti-nuclear, you would have to ask them why that is so. Also in Italy, they did have a few plants but a referendum gave a negative answer and so these plants were shutdown before the end of their life. Italians would have to tell you why they voted that way, and whether this opinion still holds today
Not building them in earthquake zones would be one way.
Widespread radioactive contamination
All nuclear power plants (Australian or otherwise) need to be located near a source of cooling water. That means being near a river or lake or sea.
NIMBY
Mexico does NOT have nuclear weapons. Its of no use to us. Mexico has what many countries crave, no problems with other countries, so much so, that Mexico's military isn't trained for war, its just trained for defense inside the county. If Mexico began to produce nuclear weapons, it would mean a large split in US-Mexican relations, and Mexican-World relations.