No, but I can't quite understand your sentence. I would suggest either "would bring the budget in line with .... AN OBJECT", or "would enable/allow the budget not to exceed the permitted...".
No, it is correct grammar, not a correct grammar.
No, it is not.If Manila is the name of a person, then "... minutes, Manila" is correct grammar but it is still not a correct grammar.
What is 'hafe'??? To correct your English Grammar, the question should read ' What is half of 31? ' The answer is 31/2 = 15.5 = 151/2
A grammatically correct version of this sentence is: "All except John are tall." This sentence could also be expressed through different words. For example: "All other than John are tall." "All are tall apart from John."
In grammar, three dots in a row indicates a pause. It is expected that the sentence or dialogue will continue after the dots. Four dots means a pause and the end of that sentence.
No, "will be had" is not a correct grammar. The correct grammar would be "will have."
No, it is correct grammar, not a correct grammar.
The correct grammar is: "Are those correct?"
"On a train" is correct grammar.
The correct grammar for this sentence is: "When did you send it?"
No, the correct grammar would be "I hate you the way you hate me."
no_____If the sentence is You do do that (meaning You are in the habit of doing that) the grammar is perfectly correct and the sentence 'does have correct grammar'.
"July has just been started" is not correct grammar, instead the correct grammar is "July has just started."
The correct way to phrase this question is: "Is my mother and I correct grammar?"
its has he kissed you yet that's the correct grammar-Erendiraa
Grammar.
The grammar is correct as it is.