He was a king. He had been Striven to achieve the throne by his uncle.
We continually strive to better our service to our customers.
The past participle of "strive" is "striven" or "strived."
The suggestion that the money he had striven for from youth to age should go to some reprobate foreigner, to pay his gambling-debts, nearly threw him into a convulsion .
Both "has striven" and "has strived" are correct. "Has striven" is more commonly used in formal writing, while "has strived" is acceptable in both formal and informal contexts.
I strive to explain right now. Indeed, I am striving to explain. Yesterday, I strove to explain. In the past, I have striven to explain. If I keep this up for long enough, I will have striven to explain. The verb to strive means, basically, to try. If you noun the verb, an ancient practice that some purists hate despite the fact that we have always done it, the strivers are those who strive, and the striven could be those who have striven or who have been the object of striving. I have never heard the noun phrase "the striven" before.
Both are correct as they are both in the Present Perfect.
Contended with God.
I would use it correctly in a sentence, of course. Thank you for asking.
Jarry use paroxysm in a sentence.\
Would not that be "Would not that be?"?
I would use the word "theory" in a sentence like this: "The scientist presented a new theory to explain the findings of the experiment."
You would use 'me' in this case. You use 'I' when you are the subject of the sentence, and 'me' when you are the object of the sentence or the phrase, as in this case.Subject of sentence: I was going to get a picture.Object of phrase: I was going to get a picture of Kaeleah and me.Object of sentence: It was Kaeleah andme in the picture.