a insect like animal the feeds off the living usually going inside them for example: a tape worm
The state or behavior of a parasite; the act of a parasite., The state of being parasitic.
that's not a word because fungal and parasite are two completely difforenty words andmeanings
Intracellular parasite-- An organism which can only feed and live within the cell of a different animal.
A parasite is defined as one organism living off another - without benefit to the host.
That is the definition of a parasite. I believe. They have to have a host to live. Im pretty sure anyway
Im assuming that you havent ever even hear the definition of parasite or host, but the HOST is what the PARASITE LIVES ON . aka it means the parisite takes everything it needs from the host.
A paratenic host is an organism that can harbor a parasite without the parasite undergoing any development or multiplication. The parasite remains in a dormant state until the paratenic host is consumed by the definitive host, where the parasite can then continue its life cycle. This allows the parasite to be transmitted to the definitive host through the paratenic host.
I'm assuming you mean parasite, and if that's the case, a parasite is a living being that gains something for itself at the cost of harming another living being in some manner.
A parasite spends most of its life in or on the tissue of a host which would is very harmful to it.
A lea is a parasite, but a parasite is not always a flea.
yes a louse is a parasite! :)
No. Although its biological behavior is like that of a parasite, it is not, by definition, a parasite. This isn't really a useful answer, but it's not really a useful question. It's like saying your newborn child doesn't think George Bush is a very good President. Well, he doesn't think he's a bad President either. Calling something a parasite describes a relationship where one organism lives at the expense of another. And the embryo does live at the expensive of the mother/host. However, a parasite by definition cannot be the same species as its host. So an embyro, no matter how much it harms the mother, cannot technically be a parasite. Again, it just isn't useful to categorize an embryo as a parasite or not a parasite. It doesn't add or subtract anything to our understanding of what the embryo actually does. You would also have to argue that the host gets no benefit from reproducing. I think a biologist would laugh himself silly if you said that to him.