The idiomatic expression "rich man's child" often refers to someone who is privileged or has advantages due to their family's wealth, leading to a sense of entitlement or a lack of understanding of hardship. It suggests that such individuals may take their advantages for granted and may not appreciate the value of hard work or struggle. The phrase can also imply a certain disconnect from the realities faced by those who are less fortunate.
Tata nano
RICH UNCLE PENNYBAGS
Rich men could pay a man to take their place in the draft. Therefore poor men fought in a rich man's place.
It meant poor white trash fighting for the continued wealth of slave-owners
That would be a Valet (pronounced val-ay).
A rich and influential person.
Jane Goodall was not poor as a child but not super rich
People in the South referred to the Civil War as "The rich mans' war and the poor mans' fight" because the North [the rich men] due to the industrial revolution had more money and you tactics and weapons one might use in a major war. While the South [the poor men] were still economically based through agriculture and did not have the extra money the North had because they stayed that way and did not industrialised the South had to use more common weapons and different tactics to match up with the weapons they had to use.
She was not rich when she was a child, but she became rich after she made the American flag.
yes she was
No, he was not.
rich soil and mild climate made good conditions for farming