Yes, in London, only men were allowed to act, as acting women were considered improper. However, the farther you got away from London, the more and more frequently female actrs would appear. This also means that all of the passionate love scenes were done by two men.
Not just the Globe Theatre but any theatre. I think its to do with acting being thought as a disreputable enterprise and not the kind of thing women should get involved in.
No there was only one globe theatre and that was the one built in 1599 by william Shakespeare's company
The Globe Theatre is the theatre most often associated with Shakespeare. However, it was not his theatre in the sense that your car is your car. He did not own it although he did have a financial interest in it. It was not the only theatre he had a financial interest in. It is far from the only theatre he acted in; he acted in many others. It was not the only place Shakespeare's plays were seen (although they were performed there) and they played lots of plays by people other than Shakespeare there. Finally, none of his contemporaries would ever have thought of the Globe as "Shakespeare's theatre"; almost certainly it would be "the Burbages' theatre."
Yes there was seats in the globe theatre but only on the balconies People also sat on the floor and on the actual stage
There were only two stages in the Globe Theater. They were the inner stage and the outer stage. The outer stage projected into the courtyard where actors were actively performing. The inner stage was where actors waited for their part to begin.
Not just the Globe Theatre but any theatre. I think its to do with acting being thought as a disreputable enterprise and not the kind of thing women should get involved in.
yes
No there was only one globe theatre and that was the one built in 1599 by william Shakespeare's company
Yes as in Elizabethan culture it was socially unacceptable for women to be actors in the theatre. So as a consequence female parts were played by males.
Not only at the Globe but at all Elizabethan and Jacobean theatres, of which there were several dozen, actors got partial scripts called "sides" with only the actor's lines and his cues on it. This was to discourage actors from selling the scripts to a rival company.
The Globe Theatre is the theatre most often associated with Shakespeare. However, it was not his theatre in the sense that your car is your car. He did not own it although he did have a financial interest in it. It was not the only theatre he had a financial interest in. It is far from the only theatre he acted in; he acted in many others. It was not the only place Shakespeare's plays were seen (although they were performed there) and they played lots of plays by people other than Shakespeare there. Finally, none of his contemporaries would ever have thought of the Globe as "Shakespeare's theatre"; almost certainly it would be "the Burbages' theatre."
Yes there was seats in the globe theatre but only on the balconies People also sat on the floor and on the actual stage
The Globe Theatre was not only designed by actors and intended for actors but was also paid for by the Lord Chamberlain's Men, Shakespeare's acting company.
There is only one stage in Shakespeare's Globe Theatre in London.
There were only two stages in the Globe Theater. They were the inner stage and the outer stage. The outer stage projected into the courtyard where actors were actively performing. The inner stage was where actors waited for their part to begin.
Sure, children are welcome at most performances at Shakespeare's Globe Theatre. They often have school tours there. You are aware that the name "Shakespeare's Globe theatre" can only refer to the theatre built in 1997 and can never refer to the one built in 1599, aren't you?
It's most often associated with him, yes. But he was not the sole owner or even the largest shareholder. It was not the only theatre he had a share in. It was far from the only theatre he acted in. He had nothing to do with its construction.