Essentially it made Brutus feel guilt.
The tragedy in Julius Caesar lies not in the death of Julius Caesar, but in the failure of Brutus and Cassius to adapt themselves to conditions after his death. Cassius fails, not because he lacks ability, but because he allows his prejudice against Caesar to impact his character, He also fails because he allows his friendship with Brutus to overrule his better judgment. Brutus Fails because he is an idealist who lacks the practical judgment to be a good leader.
i think that Marc Antony is the hero of the the play the tragedy of Julius Caesar because he revealed the unknown to the people concerning the assassination of Julius Caesar ,he made people know that the conspirators so called the honorable were those behind the honor killing of Julius Caesar and he made the people revenge the death of Julius Caesar and with the aid of his nephew octaviusfrom Brutus and Cassius after the escaped from the people. therefore Marc Antony is the hero of the play the tragedy of Julius Caesar.
By crossing the Rubicon, Caesar led his army into Italy thus causing civil war.
Well, technically speaking, dead Julius Caesar does hold more historical significance and influence than living Julius Caesar, since his assassination led to a series of events that shaped the Roman Empire. So yeah, in terms of impact and legacy, dead Caesar wins this one. But hey, I wouldn't want to be the one to tell him that to his face!
Julius Caesar actually had very little impact on our government today. Today's governments are sometimes based on Roman ideas, but they were not Caesar's ideas. Caesar was a man of his times and he gained office by following the Roman rules, which were different from ours. About the only impact that could be connected to him is the two-party system. Caesar was a populist, or liberal in today's terms and his opponents were the optimates, or conservatives.
The tragedy in Julius Caesar lies not in the death of Julius Caesar, but in the failure of Brutus and Cassius to adapt themselves to conditions after his death. Cassius fails, not because he lacks ability, but because he allows his prejudice against Caesar to impact his character, He also fails because he allows his friendship with Brutus to overrule his better judgment. Brutus Fails because he is an idealist who lacks the practical judgment to be a good leader.
Brutus embodies the archetype of the tragic hero in Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar." He is a noble and honorable character whose internal conflict and moral dilemmas lead to his downfall. Driven by his ideals of justice and the greater good, his decision to betray Caesar ultimately results in catastrophic consequences, showcasing the tragic flaws of idealism and naivety. Brutus's journey reflects the complexity of human motives and the tragic impact of misguided loyalty.
The question of who is a better leader between Antony and Brutus in Julius Caesar is subjective and depends on one's perspective. Antony is known for his charisma, rhetorical skills, and ability to mobilize the masses, while Brutus is portrayed as honorable, principled, and strategic. Antony's leadership style is more emotionally driven and populist, while Brutus is more rational and idealistic. Ultimately, the effectiveness of their leadership qualities is determined by the outcome of their actions and the impact on their followers.
i think that Marc Antony is the hero of the the play the tragedy of Julius Caesar because he revealed the unknown to the people concerning the assassination of Julius Caesar ,he made people know that the conspirators so called the honorable were those behind the honor killing of Julius Caesar and he made the people revenge the death of Julius Caesar and with the aid of his nephew octaviusfrom Brutus and Cassius after the escaped from the people. therefore Marc Antony is the hero of the play the tragedy of Julius Caesar.
Caesar represents an attitude to governance which the conspirators, especially Brutus, want to eliminate. Like many another revolutionary, Brutus believed that if once Caesar were eliminated, the Roman Republic would return to the virtuous and noble style of government which it enjoyed in the time of his ancestor. Unfortunately the factors which led to Caesar's success would not die with him. They could kill Caesar but not the style of governance which he represents; that is carried on by Antony and Octavian, who ends up perfecting it.
Genius,Pop Culture,and The Punic Wars
he was really not all that respected people feared him!
By crossing the Rubicon, Caesar led his army into Italy thus causing civil war.
They both made a big impact on their countries and the world
Shakespeare wrote "Julius Caesar" to explore themes of power, betrayal, and the consequences of ambition. The play delves into the complexities of political intrigue and the impact of individual actions on society.
Well, technically speaking, dead Julius Caesar does hold more historical significance and influence than living Julius Caesar, since his assassination led to a series of events that shaped the Roman Empire. So yeah, in terms of impact and legacy, dead Caesar wins this one. But hey, I wouldn't want to be the one to tell him that to his face!
Julius Caesar actually had very little impact on our government today. Today's governments are sometimes based on Roman ideas, but they were not Caesar's ideas. Caesar was a man of his times and he gained office by following the Roman rules, which were different from ours. About the only impact that could be connected to him is the two-party system. Caesar was a populist, or liberal in today's terms and his opponents were the optimates, or conservatives.