Shakespeare's cut of the profits of a performance was a percentage, so it depended how many tickets were sold. The gross take from a performance might be as much as 15 pounds, but Henslowe's diary suggests that it was more often less than five pounds, and often three. From this, hired actors had to be paid their wage and accounts for feeding the apprentices, repairing the costumes, buying new scripts and props and so on had to be paid. From what was left over, Shakespeare got a percentage depending on how many partners there were in the company at the time. Sometimes it was about 12.5%. Of course, there was also his share of the net profit of the theatre buildings, and rents on his other properties and so on which also contributed to his income.
We don't have his account books so we cannot know exactly.
Shakespeare wrote all of his plays for the same reason--to make money. It was his job.
None. He's deceased.
yes because it was his job. :D
Shakespeare wrote this play for the same reason he wrote all of his plays: to make money.
He had no money
It made approxamitely $50.
Shakespeare wrote all of his plays for the same reason--to make money. It was his job.
To make money.
None. He's deceased.
Shakespeare in Love grossed $279,500,000 worldwide.
Shakespeare in Love grossed $100,317,794 in the domestic market.
depends on if he made money at all or make lots of money , but yes in both terms of use he made mony
To make money, mostly. It was his job.
Yes. It was his job.
yes because it was his job. :D
Shakespeare wrote this play for the same reason he wrote all of his plays: to make money.
Unfortunately we do not have his income tax return (they didn't have income tax then) or a financial statement from an accountant so we don't know.