Two people. Artemidorus, the guy who tries to warn Caesar about the conspiracy, signs his letter of warning to Caesar "thy lover, Artimedorus". Brutus, also, in his speech to the people says "as I slew my best lover for the good of Rome, I have the same dagger for myself", referring, of course, to Caesar.
Antony calls Brutus "the noblest Roman of all" and so he was, but Antony's praise for him is cynical. Antony's lack of nobility enabled him to become a ruler in Rome; Brutus's nobility got him dead.
Brutus was a protégé of Caesar, and was considered to be one of his closest friends. That is why Caesar said "Et tu, Brute?" (What? You too, Brutus??) when Brutus stabbed him, and why Antony calls Brutus Caesar's angel.
Caesar:Who is it in the press that calls on me?I hear a tongue shriller than all the musicCry "Caesar!" Speak, Caesar is turn'd to hear.Soothsayer:Beware the ides of March.Caesar:What man is that?Brutus:A soothsayer bids you beware the ides of March.(Figure something bad is going to happen on March 15th...knives will be involved.)
Brutus held great respect for Antony, despite Antony's friendship with Ceaser. Antony openly decieved Caeser in Act 3, but following this, he begins to respect Brutus and once finding Brutus's body, he calls him "The nobelest roman of all."
Mark Anthony calls Brutus an honourable man repeatedly when addressing the general (public), and in so doing influences the crowd into thinking the exact opposite to change public opinion against him after his part in slaying Julius Caesar.
julius caesar
Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.
He supposedly reads Caesars will. It it proves that Caesar was not a tyrant and that he loved and cared for his people. Mark Anthony then goes on to show the crowd the bloodied robe of Caesar and calls out Brutus and the conspirators for what they really are, treasonous murderers.
He is usually known as Cato, although his full name was Marcus Porcius Cato. His daughter's name, using the Roman formula that calls the daughter of Julius Julia and the daughter of Claudius Claudia, should be Porcia, but the spelling Portia is more flattering.
Julius Caesar was the hero of the people and a villain in the eyes of his political enemy. They saw him as an ambitious man who would not stop at nothing to gain popularity and power. They also thought that he would dismantle the institutions of the Rome Republic and make himself a king, which to the Republicans meant tyranny .
Antony calls Brutus "the noblest Roman of all" and so he was, but Antony's praise for him is cynical. Antony's lack of nobility enabled him to become a ruler in Rome; Brutus's nobility got him dead.
Your question calls for a opinion, so here is mine. Julius Caesar lived over 2,050 years ago. His culture, beliefs, and outlook were different from ours. One cannot compare the actions of people from an ancient era with present day people's action. However we can find parallels if we look for them as human nature does not change. We can take anyone from the present and find a comparison with anyone from the past. For example, Caesar was sensitive about his baldness; guys today get hair transplants. So if your uncle Mervin got a hair transplant, he could be compared to Julius Caesar. Our comparisons can only be made in the human nature aspects of people. It can be done with any historical figure.Your question calls for a opinion, so here is mine. Julius Caesar lived over 2,050 years ago. His culture, beliefs, and outlook were different from ours. One cannot compare the actions of people from an ancient era with present day people's action. However we can find parallels if we look for them as human nature does not change. We can take anyone from the present and find a comparison with anyone from the past. For example, Caesar was sensitive about his baldness; guys today get hair transplants. So if your uncle Mervin got a hair transplant, he could be compared to Julius Caesar. Our comparisons can only be made in the human nature aspects of people. It can be done with any historical figure.Your question calls for a opinion, so here is mine. Julius Caesar lived over 2,050 years ago. His culture, beliefs, and outlook were different from ours. One cannot compare the actions of people from an ancient era with present day people's action. However we can find parallels if we look for them as human nature does not change. We can take anyone from the present and find a comparison with anyone from the past. For example, Caesar was sensitive about his baldness; guys today get hair transplants. So if your uncle Mervin got a hair transplant, he could be compared to Julius Caesar. Our comparisons can only be made in the human nature aspects of people. It can be done with any historical figure.Your question calls for a opinion, so here is mine. Julius Caesar lived over 2,050 years ago. His culture, beliefs, and outlook were different from ours. One cannot compare the actions of people from an ancient era with present day people's action. However we can find parallels if we look for them as human nature does not change. We can take anyone from the present and find a comparison with anyone from the past. For example, Caesar was sensitive about his baldness; guys today get hair transplants. So if your uncle Mervin got a hair transplant, he could be compared to Julius Caesar. Our comparisons can only be made in the human nature aspects of people. It can be done with any historical figure.Your question calls for a opinion, so here is mine. Julius Caesar lived over 2,050 years ago. His culture, beliefs, and outlook were different from ours. One cannot compare the actions of people from an ancient era with present day people's action. However we can find parallels if we look for them as human nature does not change. We can take anyone from the present and find a comparison with anyone from the past. For example, Caesar was sensitive about his baldness; guys today get hair transplants. So if your uncle Mervin got a hair transplant, he could be compared to Julius Caesar. Our comparisons can only be made in the human nature aspects of people. It can be done with any historical figure.Your question calls for a opinion, so here is mine. Julius Caesar lived over 2,050 years ago. His culture, beliefs, and outlook were different from ours. One cannot compare the actions of people from an ancient era with present day people's action. However we can find parallels if we look for them as human nature does not change. We can take anyone from the present and find a comparison with anyone from the past. For example, Caesar was sensitive about his baldness; guys today get hair transplants. So if your uncle Mervin got a hair transplant, he could be compared to Julius Caesar. Our comparisons can only be made in the human nature aspects of people. It can be done with any historical figure.Your question calls for a opinion, so here is mine. Julius Caesar lived over 2,050 years ago. His culture, beliefs, and outlook were different from ours. One cannot compare the actions of people from an ancient era with present day people's action. However we can find parallels if we look for them as human nature does not change. We can take anyone from the present and find a comparison with anyone from the past. For example, Caesar was sensitive about his baldness; guys today get hair transplants. So if your uncle Mervin got a hair transplant, he could be compared to Julius Caesar. Our comparisons can only be made in the human nature aspects of people. It can be done with any historical figure.Your question calls for a opinion, so here is mine. Julius Caesar lived over 2,050 years ago. His culture, beliefs, and outlook were different from ours. One cannot compare the actions of people from an ancient era with present day people's action. However we can find parallels if we look for them as human nature does not change. We can take anyone from the present and find a comparison with anyone from the past. For example, Caesar was sensitive about his baldness; guys today get hair transplants. So if your uncle Mervin got a hair transplant, he could be compared to Julius Caesar. Our comparisons can only be made in the human nature aspects of people. It can be done with any historical figure.Your question calls for a opinion, so here is mine. Julius Caesar lived over 2,050 years ago. His culture, beliefs, and outlook were different from ours. One cannot compare the actions of people from an ancient era with present day people's action. However we can find parallels if we look for them as human nature does not change. We can take anyone from the present and find a comparison with anyone from the past. For example, Caesar was sensitive about his baldness; guys today get hair transplants. So if your uncle Mervin got a hair transplant, he could be compared to Julius Caesar. Our comparisons can only be made in the human nature aspects of people. It can be done with any historical figure.
he calls himself stupid
Brutus was a protégé of Caesar, and was considered to be one of his closest friends. That is why Caesar said "Et tu, Brute?" (What? You too, Brutus??) when Brutus stabbed him, and why Antony calls Brutus Caesar's angel.
Your question calls for an opinion, so I can only give mine. In my thinking Julius Caesar was much more successful than Alexander the Great. I base this on what the two leaders left to posterity. Caesar, for starters, had the common sense to make a will and designate an heir so his reforms and family name would continue. Alexander foolishly did no such thing and there was turmoil and division after his death and all his victories were for nothing, as there was no large Macedonian empire after he died. True, there was civil war after Caesar's death, but it was settled and Rome grew and prospered. Caesar also gave us numerous innovations and left us literature while Alexander left the world nothing except the historical fact that he was a great military leader.
Odysseus calls himself Noman..
Caesar:Who is it in the press that calls on me?I hear a tongue shriller than all the musicCry "Caesar!" Speak, Caesar is turn'd to hear.Soothsayer:Beware the ides of March.Caesar:What man is that?Brutus:A soothsayer bids you beware the ides of March.(Figure something bad is going to happen on March 15th...knives will be involved.)