In act 3 when Juliet is talking to her parents explain how some of Juliet's lines are filled with double meaning?

Answer 1

Juliet's entire conversation with Paris in Act 4 Scene 1 is ambiguous. Paris greets her as his wife and she says "That may be, sir, when I may be a wife." It looks like she is saying that he should not call her wife until after the wedding, but what she means is that she will never be his wife. Paris says that she must be his wife on Thursday, and she says "What must be, shall be." Paris might get the impression that she is agreeing with him, but she is not. She is only saying that what will happen will happen, which might be anything. That's pretty obvious, a "certain text" as the Friar says. She continues equivocating while Paris tries to get her to admit that she loves him. She finally says, "If I do so, it will be of more price, being spoke behind your back than to your face." Paris is satisfied, but he shouldn't be, because all this hinges on the phrase "If I do so". And she won't

Answer 2

Juliet often found herself engaged in conversations in which she could not afford to tell the truth. On the other hand, it is wrong to tell a boldfaced lie, so she equivocated: she said things which would be understood one way by the people she was talking to and another by herself and by the audience. This is true in her conversation with her mother and later with her father and later still the conversation with Paris. It's not true of her conversations with Romeo, though--there are no secrets between them.

Answer 3

That she had sexual intercourse with Romeo.

Answer 4

Juliet uses a lot of double-talk in both Act 3 and Act 4 of the play.

Answer 5

It's funny, especially if one of the double meanings is naughty. Shakespeare's audiences loved off-colour humour.