No.
Is this the same play as Romeo and Juliet? If so, the conflict is between the Capulets and Montagues. If not, maybe you need to specify whether it is a novel or a film or what.
Henry Butler Pacey has written: 'Considerations upon the present state of the wool trade, the laws made concerning that article, and how far the same are consistent with true policy, and the real interest of the state. By a gentleman, resident on his estate in Lincolnshire'
Signing a free trade agreement with a group of other countries
well the conflict would be....... that Charles creayes a character by lying. in other words he is rtying to get attention by changing but at the same time trying to not get in trouble
Theban King Creon issued a decree for Eteocles and Polyneices, who were his nephews and Antigone's brothers. The decree allowed Eteocles to receive proper funerary procedures since he was loyal to Thebes in the battle against Argos. At the same time, the decree denied those same god-given rights to Polyneices, who was disloyal to Thebes in the conflict.
It's a conflict of interest.
You would not be able to use the same attorney.
If a person signs on for an appointment at two companies at the same time, there may be a conflict of interest. A person should schedule their appointments for times that do not conflict.
These empires may have existed without conflict due to their geographic distance from each other, their focus on different areas of interest or resources, or their diplomatic strategies to maintain peaceful relations. Additionally, they may have had alliances, trade agreements, or treaties in place that helped prevent conflicts from arising.
An example might be if he represents two separate clients both charged wtih the same offense.
conflict of interest is a situation in which someone in a position of trust, such as a lawyer, insurance adjuster, a politician, executive or director of a corporation or a medical research scientist or physician, has competing professional or personal interests. Such competing interests can make it difficult to fulfill his or her duties impartially. A conflict of interest exists even if no unethical or improper act results from it. A conflict of interest can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the person, profession, or court system. A conflict can be mitigated by third party verification or third party evaluation noted below-but it still exists. Note: This summary incorrectly implies that conflicts of interest only apply to professionals. A conflict of interest arises when anyone has two duties which conflict - for example an employee's duty to well and faithfully perform their work as purchasing manager, and that same employee's familial duty to their sibling who happens to be tendering for the sale of widgets to the employee's employer. In that case the employee has a conflict of interest, despite the fact that they are not a lawyer, doctor, politician etc
regions of us had grown different that they seldom shared the same economic interest or political rights.
No but if it's the same bank, the rates and closing costs will be the same but the individual broker may cut a fee or two for you..
Conflict of interest is a philosophic idea in which you are partial or biased because of personal gain or proclivity for yourself or another. It can't be illegal because you're allowed to look out for yourself and others at will. Conflict of interest only comes up in the legal arena when your interest in yourself may conflict with you giving accurate or impartial answers to questions during your testimony.Where elected or appointed officials are concerned, states have laws governing what officials and candidates can and cannot do in their interactions with private individuals and corporations. Politicians who provide preferential treatment can face adverse public opinion, and even criminal charges including bribery or malfeasance.
I'd say it would be iffy. Part of it will depend on the law firm. If we are talking the exact same attorney, yes it would be a conflict. If you are talking the same firm, but different people, there could be a 'Chinese Wall' set up to avoid any conflict. Even so, if there is ongoing litigation between you and your ex-wife, it could definitely be a conflict. Regardless, I'd ask my wife to change lawyers.
Most agencies will allow siblings to work together, however, because of the opportunity for conflict of interest, they will allow them to work in a supervisory position.
No. It would be a conflict of interest, a violation of attorney-client privilege, and a violation of the law professions canon of ethics