0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
All clowns are funny individuals Some sad people are clowns Therefore some sad people are funny individuals Is this valid?
Of course. If all A is B, and some C is A, then some C is B.
Which of the following ladies and attendants is not a valid match?
Desdemona And Bianca
What is meant by the joke David Hume could out consume?
Besides being a philosopher, Hume was also an economist and developed ideas that are still prevalent in the field of economics. The joke directly refers to his development of the price-specie-flow mechanism. Remember that the Python boys where HIGHLY educated. Another good example of their philosophical reasoning can be found in Graham Chapmans referee of the footballgame between the German and greek philosophers. Funny and valid.
What is the need for a grammar in system programming?
To chech wheather the given input is valid or not,with semantically.
Why do people answer dumb questions on this site?
Because they are dumb. I agree people should put reasonable and valid answers!
All clowns are funny individuals Some sad people are clowns Therefore some sad people are funny individuals Is this valid?
Of course. If all A is B, and some C is A, then some C is B.
Syllogisms All clowns are funny individuals Some sad people are clowns Therefore some sad people are funny individuals Valid or Invalid?
Invalid, no then p1 a -> b p2 b -> c c a -> c
Can a syllogism violate all five rules?
No, a syllogism cannot violate all five rules of a valid syllogism. The five rules (validity, two premises, three terms, middle term in both premises, and major and minor terms in conclusion) are essential for a syllogism to be considered logical. If all five rules are violated, the argument would not be considered a syllogism.
What are the difference between affirmative syllogism to negative syllogism?
Affirmative Syllogism: All P are Q X is a P X is a Q Negative Syllogism: All P are Q X is not a Q X is not P Both syllogisms are always valid. but dont be fooled by their evil twins the fallacy of affirmation and the fallacy of negation.
Which syllogism is solid?
A solid syllogism is one that has true premises and a valid logical structure. An example of a solid syllogism would be: All humans are mortal (true premise) Socrates is a human (true premise) Therefore, Socrates is mortal (valid conclusion)
What is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations?
One type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations is called modus ponens. This form of reasoning involves affirming the antecedent to reach a valid conclusion.
Who had the greatest influence in the field of logic particularly with his invention of the syllogism as a tool for deductive reasoning?
Aristotle is considered to have the greatest influence in the field of logic for his development of the syllogism as a tool for deductive reasoning. His work on logic set the foundation for Western philosophy and provided a structured method for valid arguments.
Can the Premises in syllogisms be true false or valid?
The premises in syllogisms can be true or false, depending on the accuracy of the statements. The validity of a syllogism is determined by the logical structure of the argument, not just the truth of the premises.
What is an example of syllogism?
An example of a syllogism might be that all land animals are mammals most land animals are mammals e.g.: a mammoth but some aren't e.g., penguins are birds because they have feathers, lay eggs and are warm blodded they spend half of their time in water and half on land
Use the law of syllogism to write a valid conclusion for the given information if today it January 1 then it is new years day if today is new years day then school is closed?
If today is january first then school is closed.
What is disjunctive syllogism in philosophy?
Disjunctive syllogism is a valid form of argument in philosophy that states if one of two opposite propositions is false, then the other must be true. It involves a disjunction, where one of the two options presented must be accepted. This logical structure is commonly used to make deductions based on the elimination of one possibility.
Is all people have eyes all animals have eyes therefore all people are animals a valid syllogism?
I think to make it valid, your second premise would need to be "Only animals have eyes". The statement "All animals have eyes" allows that there could be something that has eyes that is not an animal, so it does not require the conclusion tht all people are animals.
