Except to the extent that Shakespeare knew that he couldn't write anything which might criticize the monarch, since people who wrote those kinds of things went to jail, the king and queen had no influence on Shakespeare's writing.
Loads of people. Everyone in Stratford knew him. Anyone in London who went to plays had probably seen him act, and a lot of people knew him not only to see him but by name. That is why there were dirty jokes being made about him and his female fans. However, it is hard to say who knew him really well: his wife and their neighbours in Stratford, the Sadlers, and his close associates at the theatre, perhaps.
Shakespeare was using common people in Elizabethan England as his model. He knew nothing about the common people of Ancient Rome. Mind you, we don't know much about either ourselves--for all we know, his portrayal may be accurate for either.
ordinary individual, often placed in extraordinary circumstances
There are two authenticated pictures of William Shakespeare. One is the engraving made by Martin Droushout which appears in the first folio, and which is approved by people who knew him as a good likeness. The other is the memorial in the church at Stratford which was approved by his family, who must have known what he looked like. From there we start getting into murkier waters. The next best image is the Chandos portrait which is reasonably well authenticated, although not by contemporary sources. After that comes the Sanders, which is clearly identified as Shakespeare by an apparently contemporary label. The most recent is the Cobb, which has been put forward because a) it was owned by people whose ancestors knew Shakespeare b) someone once altered a copy of it to look like Shakespeare. Basically, any "Portrait of an unknown man" painted when Shakespeare was alive stands a chance of being put forward as a painting of him. Best to stick with the Droushout, the monument, and the Chandos.
A man during the Renaissance who was well read, could recite poetry, knew the classics and was a good soldier would likely be called a Renaissance man or a polymath.
many many people
The ISBN of The Cat Who Knew Shakespeare is 0515095826.
It's not intended to. Although the setting is ostensibly in Italy, in fact everyone would have dressed and behaved exactly as contemporary English people. Shakespeare knew nothing about Italy and didn't need to know it: he was writing plays not travelogues.
The Cat Who Knew Shakespeare has 256 pages.
The Cat Who Knew Shakespeare was created on 1988-06-01.
At the time of Shakespeare people did not want new stories they had never heard before, but they did like novel presentations and improved retellings of the old stories they all knew by heart. Shakespeare was very very good at taking old stories that everyone knew completely and updating and improving them.
Before the plays were regularly taught in schools (and only very few of them are taught in schools), people knew Shakespeare's plays from watching them be performed. It's still the best way to get to know them.
He wrote plays... surely you knew that?!
human body experimentnobody knew that much about the renaissance - because people before had only disected pigs and rats ! so everybody just thought that the human body was like that. until somebody stole a body from the gallows and disected them- they found out all about the human body
It is actually true the only people who knew how to read were people of the clergy.
Except to the extent that Shakespeare knew that he couldn't write anything which might criticize the monarch, since people who wrote those kinds of things went to jail, the king and queen had no influence on Shakespeare's writing.