Yes, to a degree.
This is a qualified yes, in that Houdini disregarded medical advice.
Traditionally, Houdini's death has been attributed to the eye-wittness account of the abdominal blows he received from university student J. Gordon Whitehead. However, a Detroit physician diagnosed Houdini with accute appendicitis and advise Houdini to seek immediate surgical treatment.
Houdini disregarded this advice and went on to his scheduled performance at the Garrick Theater (24 October 1926). During the show he fainted and after being revived continued with the performance despite his 104° F fever. When he completed the show, he was taken to Grace Hospital in Detroit where he was admitted. Seven days later, 31 October 1926, at 1;26 PM, master magician Harry Houdini died of peritonitis from a ruptured appendix.
Because he refused treatment and continued instead with the physical and mental demand and stress of performing, Houdini definitely had a hand in his own death. In a sense, it was his own fault, as in 1926, even two years before the discovery of penicillin, appendicitis was quite treatable.
His own death, Mercutios death and Romeo being exiled from Verona
Hero
No. Tragedy is a dramatic form from the Greek theatre tradition. It is more concerned with a person bringing about their own downfall through their actions. It is also linked to the classical belief that tragedy - or 'bad fate'- was in the stars and there is nothing a character can do to avert it. In a modern sense, it is more explained as a fault in a character that leads to a demise or death.
Charlie
he was a very skilled magician, but one day he died with one of his own dangerous tricks.
Nobody's Fault but My Own was created in 1998.
He would oft apologize for things that were no fault of his own. The fault line often produced violent earthquakes.
The Dursleys leave for their own protection, because when Harry turns 17 the protective charm at their home will break, even if Harry is gone it is likely that the Death Eaters will capture and torture them for information on Harry, as they would neither be particularly aware of, or care about, Harry's lack of a communicative relationship with the Dursleys.
Harry James Potter.
no
If both at determined to be 50% at fault, then each party would pay for their own damages.
No. The Dursleys abuse Harry both physically and mentally throughout his childhood. They never showed any warmth to him and often complained about his presence. Harry was made to sleep in the cupboard under the stairs until he was eleven, he wore Dudley's old clothes, was given smaller meal portions and was frequently punished for things that weren't his fault.
Yes, it will.
Yes
Yes, and everything else that is bad, isn't God's fault, it's their own fault.
Its your fault
According to Hammurabi's code of laws, if a person is harmed though no fault of his own, the culprit of the accident will have to make reparations. For example, if a house falls on a person, then it is the fault of the builder of the house.