It had a number of meanings. It meant a skill or ability, as in "There's no art to find the mind's construction in the face." (Duncan in Macbeth)
It also was one of the second person singular present indicative forms of the verb "to be", associated with the second person singular pronoun "thou". The other form was the same as the second person plural form "you are". As in French, the plural form was considered to be more polite and was used when addressing social equals, strangers or especially superiors, whereas the singular "thou art" was used when addressing lovers, pets, children and inferiors. That is why Tybalt's insult to Romeo in Romeo and Juliet, "Thou art a villain" carries an extra sting since he is addressing Romeo as an inferior. Unlike in French, the plural form has almost completely taken over, with relics of the singular form remaining in devotional material such as the early 20th century song "How Great Thou Art."
No he did not
shakespeare was a very good man
Where is Shakespeare supposed to have said this? I can't find it in any of his works.
He was good at writing Plays and poems.
William Shakespeare (An artist), he used the model , Greeth and Roman literature to help to understand the world, and as the inspiration for the art. He suggested the perspective of the drawing (art).
Shakespeare would say "Wherefore art though?"
No he did not
The Tempest
shakespeare was a very good man
Shakespeare in Love won the Oscar for Art Direction in 1998.
Where is Shakespeare supposed to have said this? I can't find it in any of his works.
Romeo, Romeo where art thou Romeo?
"to be or not to be" Shakespeare . Is this a question? Why Shakespeare mentioned 'to be or not to be' should be a good thinking question! Do you agree? Why?
He was good at writing Plays and poems.
It would have messed up the meter of the poetry that Shakespeare was writing. ... It just doesn't sound as good "Zeus, Zeus, wherefore art thou Zeus?"
No. He had no interest in set design.
Dost art as lovely as a rose, and as crafty as the fox