The Catcher in the Rye has been banned in many school districts and libraries. It's edgy subject matter like suicide and teenage rebellion caused many adults to question whether it was something young people should read.
=The crucible was banned because many schools wanted to do playwrights in their school plays but, The enlargement of witchcraft was to vulgar for audience so the language was softened. Many of America did not want the past in the present.=
Cujo written by Stephen King in 1981 was challenged by school trustees, parents and libraries after the book was published. It was added to the list of banned books in America because of it's profanity and sexually objectionable material.
'The Life of Brian' was banned by Glasgow City Council.
Juliet wasn't banned, just Romeo. Why was Romeo banned? Romeo was banned from Verona, because he killed Tybalt in a fight. During that time you were supposed to be hanged for that, but since Tybalt just killed Mercutio and Romeo was avenging his death, so he was only banned.
Drama was banned in England at 2001 but it still goes on till this day x
That would be "The Catcher in the Rye." It was banned for its use of profanity and portayal of sexuality. It also dealt with themes of teenage angst, alienation, and the sense of not belonging. I would imagine it was the profanity and sexuality that were the main reasons why the book was banned.
"Frindle" by Andrew Clements has been challenged and banned in several schools and libraries over the years since its publication in 1996. The reasons for the challenges vary, but most of them are related to perceived inappropriate language or themes in the book.
Yes. It has been banned in some schools and libraries in the United States for depictions of drug use, profanity and disturbing imagery.
The book Forever by Judy Blume was published in 1975.It is a great book but it has been banned from many libraries, schools, and stores. I think it should have only been banned from schools because it may teach a lesson of how many relationships could be.
No, "Of Mice and Men" should not be banned from schools and libraries. The novel explores important themes such as friendship, social injustice, and the pursuit of the American Dream, making it valuable for educational purposes. Banning it would limit students' exposure to important literary works.
Most public libraries support banned books.
"Stargirl" by Jerry Spinelli has been challenged and banned in some schools and libraries for several reasons, including language, references to witchcraft and the occult, and the portrayal of nonconformity and individuality. Some censorship attempts were due to its themes of nonconformity and standing out from the crowd, which some people deemed inappropriate for young readers.
Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger has been banned by many schools for its use of profanity, portraying drunkenness, prostitution, and delinquency, and for its references to sex. It has also been called "anti-white".
"The Perks of Being a Wallflower" has been banned in some schools and libraries mostly in the United States due to its mature content, including drug use, sexual references, and other sensitive topics.
It is not. It has been banned in the past at certain schools, but it is no longer currently
There is no record of any of the Ranger's Apprentice books being officially banned. However, some individual schools or libraries may have restricted access to certain books in the series due to content concerns.
"Christine" by Stephen King has been challenged and banned in some schools and libraries due to its themes of violence, language, and sexual content. Some critics also cite concerns about the promotion of unhealthy relationships and teenage rebellion in the book.