1. Tybalt is no longer a threat to Romeo.
2. Romeo's mother-in-law hates him worse than death.
3. Romeo is banished from Verona.
Getting banished from verona
The battle between Bernardo and Riff and Tybalt and Mercutio are really quite similar. In both battles, a close friend tries to stop the fight (Tony and Romeo). Also, Mercutio and Riff both get killed as a result of Romeo/Tony's interventions. Romeo and Tony kill Tybalt and Bernardo, respectively, in a fit or rage.
The prince doesn't sentence Romeo to death because: 1) If Romeo didn't kill Tybalt, he would've been executed anyway 2) Tybalt would've killed Romeo if Mercutio hadn't stepped in. Mercutio died because Tybalt killed him, and Tybalt died because Romeo killed him. 3) Tybalt paid the price for killing Mercutio, and when the prince asked who would "pay" for Mercutio's death, Montague said Romeo shouldn't have to because they were good friends, and Romeo killed Tybalt to avenge Mercutio.
There were two fights, one between Tybalt and Mercutio, in which Mercutio died, and one between Romeo and Tybalt, in which Tybalt died. For Romeo and Juliet, it was the second one which mattered, because it led to Romeo being banished from Verona so they could not be together. It also made Mrs. Capulet incredibly mad at Romeo so she would be unlikely ever to forgive him, even if she knew he was her son-in-law. Mercutio's death might have caused Romeo to be sad, but would not have the impact on his life that Tybalt's had.
There are a number of fights in Romeo and Juliet, but if you mean the one in Act 1 Scene 1, the Prince, Escalus, stopped it.
Getting banished from verona
Romeo's decision to fight Tybalt can be seen as both an act of free will and influenced by fate. While Romeo chose to engage in the fight, his impulsive nature and the events leading up to the confrontation (such as Mercutio's death) can be seen as determined by fate. Ultimately, Romeo's actions result in tragic consequences, highlighting the complex interplay between free will and destiny in the play.
i think u get jail, but not as much as u should..........
Romeo killing Tybalt in retaliation for Mercutio's death at Tybalt's hands is the Reversal of Fortune. As a result, Prince Eschylus banishes him from Verona. The "rising action" usually means act 2, and Romeo kills Tybalt in act 3 which is called the "climax" in Freytag's system.
Romeo kills Tybalt.
The battle between Bernardo and Riff and Tybalt and Mercutio are really quite similar. In both battles, a close friend tries to stop the fight (Tony and Romeo). Also, Mercutio and Riff both get killed as a result of Romeo/Tony's interventions. Romeo and Tony kill Tybalt and Bernardo, respectively, in a fit or rage.
Romeo is devastated and filled with guilt after Mercutio's death, as he blames himself for causing the fight that led to it. He becomes enraged and seeks revenge on Tybalt, leading to a chain of tragic events that ultimately result in multiple deaths.
tybalt, juliets cousin killed him, in result tybalt got killed by romeo
The prince doesn't sentence Romeo to death because: 1) If Romeo didn't kill Tybalt, he would've been executed anyway 2) Tybalt would've killed Romeo if Mercutio hadn't stepped in. Mercutio died because Tybalt killed him, and Tybalt died because Romeo killed him. 3) Tybalt paid the price for killing Mercutio, and when the prince asked who would "pay" for Mercutio's death, Montague said Romeo shouldn't have to because they were good friends, and Romeo killed Tybalt to avenge Mercutio.
Booth thought he was doing the South a favor by killing Lincoln, but he was only increasing the South's woes.
Good consequences are the results of actions taken to change or improve a situation. They can be unintended consequences, where the result was not even part of the equation.
result aftermath