Well, if Romeo had never let Tybalt find out he was at he party (he was the only one seen by Tybalt), Tybalt would never have challenged Romeo to a fight, and the whole street brawl would never have happened. If Romeo had answered Tybalt's challenge, Mercutio wouldn't have died protecting his honor. If Romeo had so much as asked why Tybalt insulted him like that, Mercutio wouldn't have felt the need to defend his friend's honor. Then there's always not stepping in the damned fight and just let Mercutio get his anger out...
So all in all, it's pretty much Romeo's fault Mercutio had died.
Questions of this type are so open-ended that there are a million different answers. If Romeo had asked his father for work outside of Verona, he would never have met Juliet in the first place. Or if he had decided not to crash Capulet's party he wouldn't have met her either. Or Romeo could have done a Paris and talked to Capulet directly about marrying Juliet. Or they could have planned to skip town immediately after marrying. Et cetera.
Of course. Romeo could have tried to hold Tybalt back. Romeo could have accepted Tybalt's challenge. Capulet could have executed Tybalt at the party instead of just calling him a princox. Benvolio could have decided to have Tybalt assasinated after the fight in Act 1. But none of these things are very likely.
Would it have made a difference if Romeo had come out an said that he had married Tybalt's cousin? Probably not.
In Romeo and Juliet, wisdom and knowledge was gained by the two families because of their children's death. So you see, a tragic experience (the death of Romeo and Juliet), helped the two families to gain wisdom and knowledge (to get over the feud that the two families had).
No, Romeo and Juliet didn't really have any control over their tragic end. Their families had been fighting for centuries and most people didn't even remember what they were feuding over. And after Tybalt, Juliet's questionable cousin, and Romeo fought over Mercutio's death, it could only lead to more death and disaster. Technically speaking, though, Romeo could have controlled his anger when he witnessed Mercutio being killed by Tybalt, or Romeo could have stayed out of the Capulet ball (where he met Juliet). No one can really blame Romeo for being angry about his best friend's death, though. The only way they could have escaped their tragic end was really to not let the entire play happen, and Romeo stayed out of Capulet affairs and Capulet ball.
There isn't one. Despite what your teacher might say, plays can be tragic without having a "tragic hero" as defined by Aristotle.There is one, actually two. Romeo and Juliet are tragic heroes because...1. They come from noble families2. They have tragic flaws3. They die because of their tragic flaws
Benvolio hopes that Romeo will realize that there are plenty of other women he could choose to be with. Romeo and Juliet was written by William Shakespeare.
Mercutio dies.
romeo is a tragic hero cos he da business
I think the tragic heroes are Rome and Juliet
A cereal named "Star-Crossed Crunch" could be inspired by the book Romeo and Juliet. It could feature heart-shaped oats and berry clusters to represent the love between Romeo and Juliet, and perhaps have a mixed flavor combination to symbolize the tragic ending of their story.
Counter strike source
Lord Montague shares the tragic news with the Prince that Lady Montague, Romeo's mother, has died from grief over Romeo's exile.
Romeo is the boy, and Juliet is the girl in the tragic love story of "Romeo and Juliet" by William Shakespeare. They come from feuding families, the Montagues and the Capulets, and their love ultimately leads to their tragic demise.
In Romeo and Juliet, wisdom and knowledge was gained by the two families because of their children's death. So you see, a tragic experience (the death of Romeo and Juliet), helped the two families to gain wisdom and knowledge (to get over the feud that the two families had).
Since both Romeo and Juliet die in Romeo and Juliet, it is definitely a tragic play.
No, Romeo and Juliet didn't really have any control over their tragic end. Their families had been fighting for centuries and most people didn't even remember what they were feuding over. And after Tybalt, Juliet's questionable cousin, and Romeo fought over Mercutio's death, it could only lead to more death and disaster. Technically speaking, though, Romeo could have controlled his anger when he witnessed Mercutio being killed by Tybalt, or Romeo could have stayed out of the Capulet ball (where he met Juliet). No one can really blame Romeo for being angry about his best friend's death, though. The only way they could have escaped their tragic end was really to not let the entire play happen, and Romeo stayed out of Capulet affairs and Capulet ball.
No, Romeo does not receive the letter explaining Juliet's plan to fake her death. This miscommunication leads to their tragic deaths.
romeo is a tragic hero cos he da business
Shakespeare's character Romeo in "Romeo and Juliet" faces tragic misadventures leading to his downfall.