It meant and still means a low-born, untrustworthy rascal. It was and is an insult, but not the strongest one. This passage from King Lear should give you an idea:
"What in the world he is That names me traitor, villain-like he lies."
A low-born person. Tybalt uses it to insult Romeo; it's a pretty feeble insult.
Neither. He was a writer. There is no record that he ever did anything heroic or villainous.
You mean, "Did Shakespeare talk in poetry all the time?" Of course not. Nobody does.
In Shakespeare's "Othello" Brabantio: Thou art a villain. Iago: You are a senator. Brabantio insults Iago and Iago makes a joking insult back.
What do you mean if Shakespeare have it? If you mean does Shakespeare have what it takes, then yes. He should any way.
Shakespeare cannot be mean - he has been dead for centuries.
Iago
Neither. He was a writer. There is no record that he ever did anything heroic or villainous.
You mean, "Did Shakespeare talk in poetry all the time?" Of course not. Nobody does.
In my opinion the most vile villain there ever was is Iago from Shakespeare's Othello.
In Shakespeare's "Othello" Brabantio: Thou art a villain. Iago: You are a senator. Brabantio insults Iago and Iago makes a joking insult back.
Said by Hamlet in Act 1, Scene 5: "...O villain, villain, smiling, damned villain! My tables,--meet it is I set it down, That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain; At least I'm sure it may be so in Denmark..." http://www.online-literature.com/shakespeare/hamlet/6/
He is mean. He is also a villain.
What do you mean if Shakespeare have it? If you mean does Shakespeare have what it takes, then yes. He should any way.
Shakespeare cannot be mean - he has been dead for centuries.
Perhaps you mean Christopher Marlowe.
Macbeth is. Nor is it the only one of Shakespeare's plays where the main character is the villain. Richard III (a very similar play) is another example. Marlowe did it too e.g. The Jew of Malta.
In his time, it was a punishment for murder or just banishment to leave and never come back.