0
He believe it may be an act of the devil trying to get the court to free the woman accused of being witches. He states "It does not escape me that this deposition may be devised to blind us." He believes Mary Warren may be conquered by Satan who is trying to prolong or stop the hanging of the people charged with witchcraft.
What else can I help you with?
Why does danforth not want hale in the jail?
Danforth does not want Hale in the jail because he views him as a potential threat to the authority and legitimacy of the court. Hale, having become disillusioned with the witch trials and the injustice occurring, could undermine the court's proceedings and encourage others to question the validity of the accusations. Danforth is concerned that Hale's presence might inspire dissent and challenge his control over the situation, potentially leading to a loss of power and credibility for the court.
Why might Danforth be unwilling to believe that Abigail has been pretending this whole time?
Danforth may be unwilling to believe that Abigail has been pretending because acknowledging her deceit would undermine the legitimacy of the court and the trials, which he has a vested interest in maintaining. He is also heavily invested in the belief that the court's actions are just, and admitting that Abigail has been manipulative could lead to a loss of authority and credibility. Additionally, he might see Abigail as a pawn in a larger moral struggle, making it difficult for him to accept that she is capable of such treachery.
Why is francis nurse terrified when danforth questions the people about the petition?
Francis Nurse is terrified when Danforth questions the people about the petition because he realizes that the signers, who are respected members of the community, could be at risk of being accused of witchcraft themselves. He understands that the court's focus on the petition might lead to a backlash against those who oppose the trials, putting their lives in jeopardy. Additionally, Francis is aware of the court's unjust nature and fears that the truth will be overshadowed by the hysteria driving the proceedings.
. Imagine that Elizabeth Proctor had told Danforth the truth. In what way might the outcome of the trials have been different?
If Elizabeth Proctor had told Danforth the truth about her knowledge of the witch trials and her husband's infidelity, it could have significantly altered the course of the trials. Her honesty might have undermined the credibility of the accusers and exposed the personal motives behind the accusations, potentially leading to a loss of faith in the court's integrity. This could have prompted a reevaluation of the evidence and testimonies, possibly resulting in a more cautious approach to the proceedings and a greater likelihood of acquittals. Ultimately, Elizabeth's truthfulness might have fostered a climate of doubt about the legitimacy of the trials, paving the way for justice rather than hysteria.
Why does danforth hesitate to accept Mary warens statement that her prior testimony was pretense?
Danforth hesitates to accept Mary Warren's statement that her prior testimony was pretense because he is deeply invested in the authority and legitimacy of the court's proceedings. Accepting her claim could undermine the validity of previous convictions and shake the foundation of the trials, which he believes are justified. Additionally, he is wary of the possibility that Mary might be manipulated or coerced by the other girls, leading to doubts about her credibility. This hesitation reflects his concern for maintaining order and control in a chaotic situation.
Can i be ordered to pay for college tuition for your children if you missed the court appearance?
An obligor who misses a court appearance might be ordered to pay for college tuition. If the obligee misses that appearance, it is unlikely that the court would enter such an order.
Why might Danforth be unwilling to believe that Abigail has been pretending this whole time?
Danforth may be unwilling to believe that Abigail has been pretending because acknowledging her deceit would undermine the legitimacy of the court and the trials, which he has a vested interest in maintaining. He is also heavily invested in the belief that the court's actions are just, and admitting that Abigail has been manipulative could lead to a loss of authority and credibility. Additionally, he might see Abigail as a pawn in a larger moral struggle, making it difficult for him to accept that she is capable of such treachery.
When a pro se plaintiff misses a court appearance for mediation?
It is NOT a good thing. Unless they contact the mediator or the court ASAP to request a re-scheduling, it might be seen as evidence that they are "abandoning" their case.
What if you do not answer a summons?
You will likely be found in contempt of court and a bench warrant will be issued for your arrest.Another View: The above answer might be correct if they were asking about a SUBPOENA. It is unlikely that you would be the subject of a warrant and jail for ignoring a SUMMONS, although you might find a Sheriff at your door to "escort" you to court if the judge deemed your appearance to be important enough.
How long before you find out if Dr Murray is guilty or innocent?
It will probably be quite a while, his next court appearance is in June, it might be 2011 before things start getting underway.
Can an email be used as evidence in a court proceeding?
Not as a substitute for someone's actual testimony or appearance in court. It MIGHT be allowed as supporting evidence for whatever is alleged, for the narrow purpose of proving that it was sent and/or received. So then I will explain the situation....... SEE THE DISCUSSION PAGE FOR FURTHER EXPLANATION OF THE QUESTION>
Do provincial court have a jury?
The provincial trial court does not, but the superior provincial court might.
What is the second court that hears a case?
You might be referring to an appeals court.
What things about a person can change after a breakup?
Their appearance might change, and they might be less emotionally stable.
What is the defendants recourse if the defendant receives a request for entry of default but does not have an appearance date?
Usually, you can contact the court and request that the court set an appearance date be set. The plaintiff's notice of the request for entry of the default might not have an appearance date, but it will state that you have a certain number of days to either file a written opposition with reasons, to the entry of a default or the right to request an appearance date to be fixed by the court. Some courts, specifically small claims courts, allow such abbreviated methods of entering defaults, but there are built in safeguards against an improper entry of a default. Many times a court permits this request without an appearance date because after all the defendant did not even bother to answer the summons and complaint, therefore, it is not unreasonable to at least request entry of a default without an appearance date as long as the defendant is told of the request and given an opportunity to object.I did respond to the original summons and complaint with proof of service, acknowledged by the court, and now I have this Request for Entry of Default, no court date or anything about my response and defense to this bank's claims. I need to know what form to use to respond or ask for dismissal based on my previous long response. Thanks.Carl
Is there a homepage on WikiAnswers?
The Crucible Act III Reading Quiz Directions: Write a well-developed short answer for each of the questions below. Be sure to use direct evidence from the text to support your answer and cite the page numbers. 1. Discuss the judges who sit before the proceedings: Hathorne and Danforth. What is revealed about their personalities and how they view their job? What is the only concern that the court has? What is missing within the proceedings to make them fair? 2. Giles Corey and John Proctor approach the court with a signed deposition. Hathorne informs them that the informants must appear before the court. What danger is there for these people to appear? What does this say about the proceedings within the court? Is this seen in today’s judicial system? What protection is there now that was not present then. 3. What is the significance of Reverend Hale’s observation that “every defense is considered an attack upon the court”? What is the significance of Danforth’s assertion that “a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it”? 4. Why does Elizabeth Proctor lie when she is questioned by Danforth? How might the outcome of the witchcraft hysteria have been different if she had told the truth? What does this reveal about her character? 5. Discuss Proctor’s internal conflict within this act. What does it take for him to come to the court and reveal the truth? Why does he do it? What is consequence he faces in telling the truth? When Elizabeth lies what happens to Proctor? 6. Discuss Mary Warren’s testimony to the court. Why does she recant her deposition? How could things have been different had she not recanted? Why does she accuse Proctor of witchcraft? 7. Discuss Giles Corey’s character. What in his character sets him up to be accused as a witch? Why does he not change his personality to appease the court? What does this reveal about him as a person? What is important about his character?
Why is danforth suspicious of Mary Warren?
Abigail is saying that she is doing God's work by pointing out the devil's people and now she is getting accused that she is pretending. Then Abigail says that Mary Waren is sending her spirit out in the court right know (by creating a cold draft) on her and the other kids. The other kids are all following Abigail's lead and they too are accusing Mary Warren of witchcraft. Danforth is suspicious of Mary Warren and John Proctor because he believes Abigail and the other girls that Mary Warren might be a witch because all the girls are under Mary Warren's spirit.
