karma came back and got him. he got banished for a while and waited to return to juliet, who he thought was dead. he decided he could not live no more without her so he killed himself. then she woke and saw him dead, then she killed herself too. these events happened because of his actions.
The prince doesn't sentence Romeo to death because: 1) If Romeo didn't kill Tybalt, he would've been executed anyway 2) Tybalt would've killed Romeo if Mercutio hadn't stepped in. Mercutio died because Tybalt killed him, and Tybalt died because Romeo killed him. 3) Tybalt paid the price for killing Mercutio, and when the prince asked who would "pay" for Mercutio's death, Montague said Romeo shouldn't have to because they were good friends, and Romeo killed Tybalt to avenge Mercutio.
Decide that they are going to make statues of Romeo and Juliet out of very expensive materials and agree to stop fighting.
Mercutio does not "save Romeo" in the play by fighting Tybalt. Tybalt is about to walk away in contempt of the coward Romeo who will not fight him, and Mercutio gets involved, ostensibly to save Romeo's honour but basically just to get into a scrap. In the 1996 Baz Luhrman movie, the director has Tybalt beating Romeo when he will not fight, which does prompt Mercutio to join the fight. In that version Mercutio thinks that Tybalt will kill Romeo and that he needs to intervene to save his life. It's a more flattering read for Mercutio than what Shakespeare wrote.
Romeo had to kill someone, in order for the sequence of events to happen properly. Tybalt has been set up as a quarrelsome man who imagines that he has a grudge against Romeo for crashing Capulet's party (Capulet didn't seem to mind) and so will inevitably create a fight, which creates the occasion for Romeo to kill him.
The antagonist in the play would be The Capulet Family or the Montague family since they would not let Romeo and Juliet be married since the ancient feud and that's why they had to get married without their families knowing.
Romeo killed Tybalt because Tybalt killed Mercutio. He made the decision without thinking about the consequences in regard to his relationship with Juliet. Had he deliberated more, he may not have done it, because the act of revenge would inevitably tear him away from his love because of the decree the prince made regarding the conflict between the Montagues and the Capulets.
The prince doesn't sentence Romeo to death because: 1) If Romeo didn't kill Tybalt, he would've been executed anyway 2) Tybalt would've killed Romeo if Mercutio hadn't stepped in. Mercutio died because Tybalt killed him, and Tybalt died because Romeo killed him. 3) Tybalt paid the price for killing Mercutio, and when the prince asked who would "pay" for Mercutio's death, Montague said Romeo shouldn't have to because they were good friends, and Romeo killed Tybalt to avenge Mercutio.
I couldn't decide what to wear to school. The teacher said he would decide later on the student's punishment.
The jury does not decide what punishment the defendant gets, the judge does. The only thing the jury decides is whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of what he is accused of.
Decide that they are going to make statues of Romeo and Juliet out of very expensive materials and agree to stop fighting.
Once a case of serious murder is done the jury decide on the verdict and the judge passes the capital punishment.
A trial is held to decide guilt of innocence, and then a hearing is held to determine punishment
That depends on the seriousness of the crime. For petty crime, shoplifting, speeding and so on, the local magistrate would decide in the Magistrates Court. The punishment would be a fine or some public service. More serious cases of crime would be tried in a crown court before a judge and jury. The jury would decide on guilt and the judge would decide on the punishment. The punishment would be jail.
Mercutio does not "save Romeo" in the play by fighting Tybalt. Tybalt is about to walk away in contempt of the coward Romeo who will not fight him, and Mercutio gets involved, ostensibly to save Romeo's honour but basically just to get into a scrap. In the 1996 Baz Luhrman movie, the director has Tybalt beating Romeo when he will not fight, which does prompt Mercutio to join the fight. In that version Mercutio thinks that Tybalt will kill Romeo and that he needs to intervene to save his life. It's a more flattering read for Mercutio than what Shakespeare wrote.
Romeo had to kill someone, in order for the sequence of events to happen properly. Tybalt has been set up as a quarrelsome man who imagines that he has a grudge against Romeo for crashing Capulet's party (Capulet didn't seem to mind) and so will inevitably create a fight, which creates the occasion for Romeo to kill him.
Killing a bad man will not make you a saint. God is the only one who can decide who is good and who is bad.
because they did revenge for killing many people in their country>:((