Want this question answered?
I just read that book :) Proctor in Act III Scene I presents a petition to Judge Danforth. This petition was signed by several members of Salem stating that they knew Sarah Good, Goody Proctor, and the others to be good Puritan women. Consequently, these petitioners were all arrested for questioning because Parris accused them of trying to undermine the court.
In The Crucible, the source of tension in the Proctor household is the witch trials being held in Salem. Tension is also present because of John Proctors affair with Abigal Williams.
In The Crucible, the source of tension in the Proctor household is the witch trials being held in Salem. Tension is also present because of John Proctors affair with Abigal Williams.
John hates her because she wants him to die in the fiery pits of hell. Then John kills himself. he wanted to lick her all over
you should know this already man
I just read that book :) Proctor in Act III Scene I presents a petition to Judge Danforth. This petition was signed by several members of Salem stating that they knew Sarah Good, Goody Proctor, and the others to be good Puritan women. Consequently, these petitioners were all arrested for questioning because Parris accused them of trying to undermine the court.
Present perfect is formed with - have/has + past participle.The past participle proctor is proctored. So present perfect is have/has proctored.He has proctored us before.
Presumably, it is in reference to the evidence that will be, or was, presented in support of the prosecution.
The Crucible Act III Reading Quiz Directions: Write a well-developed short answer for each of the questions below. Be sure to use direct evidence from the text to support your answer and cite the page numbers. 1. Discuss the judges who sit before the proceedings: Hathorne and Danforth. What is revealed about their personalities and how they view their job? What is the only concern that the court has? What is missing within the proceedings to make them fair? 2. Giles Corey and John Proctor approach the court with a signed deposition. Hathorne informs them that the informants must appear before the court. What danger is there for these people to appear? What does this say about the proceedings within the court? Is this seen in today’s judicial system? What protection is there now that was not present then. 3. What is the significance of Reverend Hale’s observation that “every defense is considered an attack upon the court”? What is the significance of Danforth’s assertion that “a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it”? 4. Why does Elizabeth Proctor lie when she is questioned by Danforth? How might the outcome of the witchcraft hysteria have been different if she had told the truth? What does this reveal about her character? 5. Discuss Proctor’s internal conflict within this act. What does it take for him to come to the court and reveal the truth? Why does he do it? What is consequence he faces in telling the truth? When Elizabeth lies what happens to Proctor? 6. Discuss Mary Warren’s testimony to the court. Why does she recant her deposition? How could things have been different had she not recanted? Why does she accuse Proctor of witchcraft? 7. Discuss Giles Corey’s character. What in his character sets him up to be accused as a witch? Why does he not change his personality to appease the court? What does this reveal about him as a person? What is important about his character?
In The Crucible, the source of tension in the Proctor household is the witch trials being held in Salem. Tension is also present because of John Proctors affair with Abigal Williams.
In The Crucible, the source of tension in the Proctor household is the witch trials being held in Salem. Tension is also present because of John Proctors affair with Abigal Williams.
When you say a statement that includes evidence, your lawyer will then present the evidence to the jury.
During a Grand Jury proceeding, the prosecutor isn't required to present all evidence in his possession. He needs to present enough to convince the jurors that there is enough evidence for an indictment.
Yes, both the prosecution and the defense present evidence in a trial. The prosecution presents evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, while the defense presents evidence to create doubt or support the defendant's innocence. Both sides have the opportunity to call witnesses, introduce documents or physical evidence, and present arguments to support their case.
grand jury
None
it is presented to a judge or a judicL .