0
What is Oedipus' false conclusion after quarreling with Teiresias in 'Oedipus Rex'?
That Teiresias and Creon are conspiring against him is the false conclusion that Theban King Oedipus reaches after quarreling with Teiresias in the play "Oedipus Rex."
Specifically, Teiresias is a long-lived, blind prophet. As advisor to the kings of Thebes since the city's founding by Cadmus, Teiresias is the authority on Theban history, the councillor on current Theban events, and the seer of the Theban future. But Oedipus does not like Teiresias' historical references, the contemporary assessment or the predicted outcome. So he rashly and mistakenly decides that the blind prophet must be planning a royal overthrow with Creon, Oedipus' brother-in-law, co-ruler and uncle.
What else can I help you with?
What false conclusion does Oedipus reach as a result of his quarrel with Teiresias in 'Oedipus Rex'?
That Teiresias and Creon are conspiring to overthrow him is the false conclusion that Oedipus reaches as a result of his quarrel with Teiresias in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.).Specifically, Teiresias the blind prophet accuses Theban King Oedipus of killing King Laius. Oedipus does not remember ever meeting Laius. It is a serious offense to kill a king, for which the current punishment is execution or exile. Either way, Creon stands to gain the royal job lost by Oedipus. Oedipus therefore thinks that Creon and Teiresias must be in cahoots.
What errors of judgment does Oedipus make in 'Oedipus Rex'?
Attributing false motives to his royal advisorand colleague are errors of judgment made by Oedipus in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.).Specifically, Theban King Oedipus judges Teiresias the blind prophet and his brother-in-law Creon to be conspiring to overthrow him. In a way, it is understandable that he has such an extreme reaction since Teiresias accuses him of killing a king, a serious offense against gods and mortals. But at the same time, it shows flawed judgment given the fact that Oedipus knows from personal experience of Teiresias' integrity and Creon's cooperativeness.
Why does Creon consider Oedipus' accusation so seriously in 'Oedipus Rex'?
That it is untrue and that it carries a capital punishment are reasons why Creon considers Oedipus' accusation so serious in "Antigone" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.).Specifically, Theban King Oedipus accuses Creon of conspiring with Teiresias the blind prophet to grab royal powers all for themselves. He charges that Creon and Teiresias are telling lies that Oedipus is King Laius' killer. It is treasonous to make false statements against the king. The liar receives a punishment of execution or exile. Oedipus seeks the death sentence.
Why does Creon tell Oedipus to go to Delphi in 'Oedipus Rex'?
To verify that he is telling the truth about how to end the pestilence is the reason why Creon tells Oedipus to go to Delphi in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.).Specifically, a pestilence is ravaging Thebes' harvests and animal and human populations. Theban King Oedipus has Creon, his brother-in-law and royal colleague, find out why and what to do from the Apolline oracle at Delphi. Creon comes back with the information that the pestilence will end with the identification and punishment of the guilty in King Laius' murder. Upon receiving the information, Oedipus asks Teiresias the blind prophet for help and gets the shocking, treasonous reply that he himself is guilty of that crime. Oedipus then announces that Creon of getting Teiresias to make this presumably false charge in order to grab all royal powers for themselves. Creon advises Oedipus that the cause and the solution are not treasonous fabrications and that its truth can be verified by asking the Apolline oracle herself.
How does the messenger prove that oedipus was not the child of polybus and merope?
A messenger from Corinth arrives and announces that Polybus is dead of natural causes; Oedipus and Jocasta gleefully accept this as evidence that the oracle which said Oedipus would kill his father was false
What false conclusion does Oedipus reach as a result of his quarrel with Teiresias in 'Oedipus Rex'?
That Teiresias and Creon are conspiring to overthrow him is the false conclusion that Oedipus reaches as a result of his quarrel with Teiresias in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.).Specifically, Teiresias the blind prophet accuses Theban King Oedipus of killing King Laius. Oedipus does not remember ever meeting Laius. It is a serious offense to kill a king, for which the current punishment is execution or exile. Either way, Creon stands to gain the royal job lost by Oedipus. Oedipus therefore thinks that Creon and Teiresias must be in cahoots.
What errors of judgment does Oedipus make in 'Oedipus Rex'?
Attributing false motives to his royal advisorand colleague are errors of judgment made by Oedipus in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.).Specifically, Theban King Oedipus judges Teiresias the blind prophet and his brother-in-law Creon to be conspiring to overthrow him. In a way, it is understandable that he has such an extreme reaction since Teiresias accuses him of killing a king, a serious offense against gods and mortals. But at the same time, it shows flawed judgment given the fact that Oedipus knows from personal experience of Teiresias' integrity and Creon's cooperativeness.
Why does Creon consider Oedipus' accusation so seriously in 'Oedipus Rex'?
That it is untrue and that it carries a capital punishment are reasons why Creon considers Oedipus' accusation so serious in "Antigone" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.).Specifically, Theban King Oedipus accuses Creon of conspiring with Teiresias the blind prophet to grab royal powers all for themselves. He charges that Creon and Teiresias are telling lies that Oedipus is King Laius' killer. It is treasonous to make false statements against the king. The liar receives a punishment of execution or exile. Oedipus seeks the death sentence.
Why does Creon tell Oedipus to go to Delphi in 'Oedipus Rex'?
To verify that he is telling the truth about how to end the pestilence is the reason why Creon tells Oedipus to go to Delphi in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.).Specifically, a pestilence is ravaging Thebes' harvests and animal and human populations. Theban King Oedipus has Creon, his brother-in-law and royal colleague, find out why and what to do from the Apolline oracle at Delphi. Creon comes back with the information that the pestilence will end with the identification and punishment of the guilty in King Laius' murder. Upon receiving the information, Oedipus asks Teiresias the blind prophet for help and gets the shocking, treasonous reply that he himself is guilty of that crime. Oedipus then announces that Creon of getting Teiresias to make this presumably false charge in order to grab all royal powers for themselves. Creon advises Oedipus that the cause and the solution are not treasonous fabrications and that its truth can be verified by asking the Apolline oracle herself.
Can a valid deductive argument have a false conclusion?
No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.
True or false Creon suspects both the sentry and Teiresias of what offense?
Accepting bribes
Can a sound argument have a false conclusion?
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
Can a valid argument lead to a false conclusion?
Yes, a valid argument can lead to a false conclusion if the premises are true but the reasoning process is flawed.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. - Valid arguments are deductive. - Arguments are valid if the premises lead to the conclusion without committing a fallacy. - If an argument is valid, that means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. - This means that a valid argument with a false premise can lead to a false conclusion. This is called a valid, unsound argument. - A valid, sound argument would be when, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true and the premises are true.
How does the presence of a false conclusion in a strong argument indicate that not all of its premises can be true?
The presence of a false conclusion in a strong argument suggests that at least one of its premises must be false, as a strong argument should lead to a true conclusion based on true premises.
When a premise supports a conclusion individually it supports the conclusion independantly is this statement true or false?
True. If a premise supports a conclusion on its own, it also supports that conclusion independently because the validity of the conclusion is not dependent on any other premises in the argument. Each premise functions as a standalone reason supporting the conclusion.
Will your hypothesis will be a statement of your conclusion on the results of the experiment?
false
