The priority scheduling algorithm is a kind of CPU scheduling algorithm where the processes that wait for the CPU are scheduled according to their priority..
scheduling algorithm
Cooperative schedulingPreemptive scheduling Rate-monotonic schedulingRound-robin schedulingFixed priority pre-emptive scheduling, an implementation of preemptive time slicingFixed-Priority Scheduling with Deferred PreemptionFixed-Priority Non-preemptive SchedulingCritical section preemptive schedulingStatic time schedulingEarliest Deadline First approachStochastic digraphs with multi-threaded graph traversal
The main advantage is that they ensure fairness to all jobs, regardless of its priority and also provide quick response time depending on the CPU time the job needs. The main disadvantage is that it provides indefinite postponement to process.
Preemptive scheduler reruns scheduling decision when process becomes ready. If the new process has priority over running process, the CPU preempts the running process and executes the new process. Non-preemptive scheduler only does scheduling decision when running process voluntarily gives up CPU. In effect, it allows every running process to finish its CPU burst.
1.) in preemptive scheduling we prempt the currently executing process, in non preemptive scheduling we allow the current process to finish its CPU burst time... 2.) in preemptive scheduling the process is forcibly sent to waiting state when a process with higher priority comes to CPU, in non preeemptive scheduling the process at running state can not be forced to leave the CPU until it completes........
Priority based algorithm
Windows XP uses a quantum-based, preemptive priority scheduling algorithm
Multilevel scheduling is a CPU scheduling algorithm that organizes processes into multiple priority levels or queues, allowing for different scheduling strategies at each level. Each queue can have its own scheduling algorithm, such as first-come, first-served or round-robin, enabling the system to optimize performance for various types of workloads. Processes are typically promoted or demoted between levels based on their behavior and resource needs. This approach enhances responsiveness and efficiency by balancing the needs of both high-priority and low-priority tasks.
The Least Slack Time scheduling algorithm is used for assigning priority based on the slack time (temporal difference between the deadline, ready time and run time) of a process.
Apple's iOS primarily uses a scheduling algorithm called "fair scheduling" for managing tasks and processes. This algorithm aims to balance responsiveness and efficiency by allocating CPU time fairly among processes while prioritizing user-interactive tasks. Additionally, iOS employs a priority-based approach for thread management, where higher-priority tasks can preempt lower-priority ones to ensure smooth user experiences. Overall, iOS combines these techniques to optimize performance and responsiveness in multitasking environments.
disadvantages of priority scheduling
In scheduling algorithms, the priority method assigns tasks based on their importance, while the First-Come, First-Serve (FCFS) algorithm processes tasks in the order they arrive, regardless of priority. This means that in FCFS, a lower-priority task can delay a higher-priority one if it arrives first. Consequently, the two algorithms can lead to different performance outcomes, particularly in terms of response time and overall system efficiency. In contrast, priority scheduling aims to minimize wait times for high-priority tasks, potentially at the cost of lower-priority ones.
There isn't a single "best" scheduling algorithm, as the effectiveness of a scheduling algorithm depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the system in question. Common algorithms include Round Robin, Shortest Job First, and Priority Scheduling, each with its strengths and weaknesses. For real-time systems, Rate Monotonic Scheduling may be preferred, while for batch processing, Shortest Job First could be more efficient. Ultimately, the best choice depends on factors such as system load, response time requirements, and resource availability.
scheduling algorithm
Advantages of Priority Scheduling-1.Simplicity.2.Reasonable support for priority.3.Suitable for applications with varying time and resource requirements.Disadvantages of Priority Scheduling-1.Indefinite blocking or starvation.2.A priority scheduling can leave some low priority waiting processes indefinitely for CPU.3.If the system eventually crashes then all unfinished low priority processes gets lost.
In that work system, the shortest job gets higher priority because more gets accomplished in any amount of time. If you have two hours to do 4 tasks and one task will take five minutes, one will take 30 minutes, one will take an hour and one will take an hour and a half, by using the shortest job first method, you will accomplish three tasks in those two hours and part of the fourth task. If you do the longest job first, you will accomplish the task that takes an hour and a half, then only part of the one hour task, but nothing on the 5 minute or 30 minute tasks. That means that by doing the shortest jobs first, you will accomplish three times as many tasks as you will by doing the longest jobs first.
Shortest Job First (SJF) scheduling and priority scheduling are both CPU scheduling algorithms used in operating systems to manage process execution. SJF selects processes based on the shortest estimated execution time, while priority scheduling selects processes based on their assigned priority levels. In some cases, SJF can be viewed as a specific type of priority scheduling where the priority is inversely related to the job length—the shorter the job, the higher its priority. Thus, both approaches aim to optimize CPU utilization but differ in the criteria they use for process selection.