acting were actors get ice thrown at them =)=)=)=)=)=)
Hutchinson was forced into exile and she went to Rhode Island.
"I couldn't decide whether to follow my passion for art or pursue a more stable career in business."
your desires comflict with someone else's, the other person might try to make up your mind for you by using coercion.
your desires comflict with someone else's, the other person might try to make up your mind for you by using coercion.
Walter Lee Younger faces internal conflict primarily between his aspirations for a better life and the harsh realities of his circumstances. He struggles with his desire to provide for his family and achieve financial success, often feeling trapped by societal limitations and his own choices. This tension leads to feelings of frustration, despair, and uncertainty about his identity and purpose. Ultimately, his internal conflict drives much of the play's narrative as he seeks to reconcile his dreams with the responsibilities he holds.
Is your question asking if I think that war is the solution between man or just mans vision? If this is what you are asking, then (in my opinion) it is a little bit if both. It just depends in how you look at it. Hitler, for example, tried to cleanse the world and create his vision of a "Utopia" through warfare and violence. But then you have your American, French, and Haitian revolutionary types where it was clear that they would have been continuously oppressed if not for their swift act to war. So that is why it is a bit of both, you have man's vision acting as a catalyst for war and you have the need to better the lives of others and improve the greater good in the long run acting as a solution. So again, it all depends on how you look at it. War can be completely necessary at times, and at other times only bring turmoil to the nations plagued by the violence. Man that was a mouthful.
It depends on alot of factors such as:- Wether or not eye witness has 20/20 vision- Visibility, for example: if crime was commited outdoors, was it dark? raining? snowing etc...-If the witness is credible ex: Law abiding citizen with no criminal record of his own, does he drink, is he on any medication known to affect his sight? For example, some antidepressants are known to cause side effects such as dizziness, blurred vision, migrains with "aura" etc....-Does the witness know the accused personally and could have a grudge,which could mean there's a comflict of interest-Does the accused have a criminal record? Has he been accused or charged with a similar offence before?? hopes this helps!!Another View: The short and simple answer is YES, it is possible. Despite all the fancy TV shows, the absolute necessity for overwhelming scientific forensic evidence is not required.The comments in the first answer are questions that a defense attorney might raise in an attempt to impeach the prosecution witness but are NOT a bar to the defendant's conviction.