0
What else can I help you with?
Why is Shakespeare going to such lengths to try to warn Caesar?
Shakespeare was not trying to warn Caesar who died 16 centuries before he was born. Are you asking what the dramatic effect is of the warning Caesar receives from the soothsayer and from Calpurnia? Dramatically, Caesar's reaction to the warnings may show him to be conceited and arrogant (or confident and level-headed, if you like him).
Should Caesar have been assassinated in the play Julius Caesar?
Murdering people is not only illegal, it is, pretty much by common consent, wrong. There have been many people who have advocated violence as a means to effect social change. In the case of Caesar, Brutus was persuaded to join the conspiracy by the argument that this bit of violence would stop the tendency of the Roman government to appoint one strong leader to rule instead of the Republican Senate. It had no such effect; Caesar was merely replaced by an even stronger leader in the person of his nephew the Emperor Augustus.
How is Julius Caesar a reflection of the political anxiety present in Elizabethan England?
Julius Caesar is a play about attempting to effect political change by assassination. An attempt of this nature was carried out in 1597 by the Earl of Essex, shortly before this play was written. The play supports the passage of power through family ties (from Julius Caesar to his adopted son Octavian) which was the most peaceful form of transition the Elizabethans could hope for.
What is the difference between Brutus' and Antony's funeral speech for Caesar?
Marcus Brutus makes his speech very formally to reason the mob for killing Caesar. He tells them that Caesar too ambitious and would eventually become a much powerful ruler and would make the Romans his slave. Brutus appeals to the people's minds and leaves an impression that Caesar would have become a tyrant. What Brutus terms as his reason is a hypothetical situation and is not reason enough for killing Caesar. He does not provide any evidence to his statement that Caesar was ambitious.Where as Mark Antony uses flawless logic and genuine emotional appeal in his masterful oratory. first of all, Antony enters dramatically to the pulpit with Caesar's body to win the sympathy of the mob. He began his speech by addressing the mob as "friends". Antony really wants to avenge Caesar and tries to convince the crowd into believing the truth that they killed Caesar out of envy. Antony appeals to people's heart.Hence, he is successful making the mob rise against the conspirators in 'mutiny' and 'rage'. Also, Antony provides evidences of Caesar's humanity and attachment to people by showing them that Caesar had made the people his inheritors of his wealth, gardens. Also Antony tells the crowd that Caesar had always sympathized with them.This has a greater effect on the people and Antony's periodical emotional outburst only contributes to Antony's impulsive and improvisatory nature serves him perfectly. Antony is gifted with the power of oratory that helped him to stir the common man. Antony proves himself everywhere Brutus was weak. With caution and gradual persuation, he proves that he is a consummate politician using gestures and skilled rhetoric to his advantage.Unlike Brutus, who prides himself on acting solely with respect to virtue and blinding himself to his personal concerns , Antony never separates his private affairs from his public actions. Antony directly appeals to the hearts of the roman people. His speech is deeply emotional as he believes that people will not listen to reason. Antony humbles himself as "no orator as Brutus is" hinting that Brutus used trickery in his speech to deceive the crowd.Thus Antony succeed to inflame the Roman mob to rise in rebellion and seek revenge on the conspirators. The mob finds it easier to accept Antony, an emotional and sincere speaker than Brutus who appears arrogant and forceful.Marcus Brutus makes his speech very formally to reason with the the mob for killing Caesar. He tells them that Caesar too ambitious and would eventually become a much more powerful ruler and would make the Romans his slaves. Brutus appeals to the people's minds and leaves an impression that Caesar would have become a tyrant. What Brutus terms as his reason is a hypothetical situation and is not reason enough for killing Caesar. He does not provide any evidence to his statement that Caesar was ambitious, whereas Mark Antony uses flawless logic and genuine emotional appeal in his masterful oratory. First of all, Antony enters dramatically to the pulpit with Caesar's body to win the sympathy of the mob. He began his speech by addressing the mob as "friends." Antony really wants to avenge Caesar and tries to convince the crowd into believing that they killed Caesar out of envy. Antony appeals to people's hearts.Hence, he is successful making the mob rise against the conspirators in "mutiny" and "rage." Also, Antony provides evidences of Caesar's humanity and attachment to people by showing them that Caesar had made the people his inheritors of his wealth, gardens, etc. Also Antony tells the crowd that Caesar had always sympathized with them.This has a greater effect on the people, and Antony's periodical emotional outbursts only contribute to his impulsive and improvisatory nature that serves him perfectly. Antony is gifted with the power of oratory that helped him to stir the common man. Antony proves himself in every place where Brutus was weak. With caution and gradual persuasion, he proves that he is a consummate politician and uses gestures and skilled rhetoric to his advantage.Unlike Brutus, who prides himself on acting solely with respect to virtue and blinding himself to his personal concerns, Antony never separates his private affairs from his public actions. Antony directly appeals to the hearts of the Roman people. His speech is deeply emotional; he believes that people will not listen to reason. Antony humbles himself as "no orator as Brutus is," hinting that Brutus used trickery in his speech to deceive the crowd.Thus Antony succeeded in instigating the Roman mob to rise in rebellion and seek revenge on the conspirators. The mob finds it easier to accept Antony, an emotional and sincere speaker, than Brutus, who appears arrogant and forceful.
What is the effect of Shakespeare and decision to open the play with a scene featuring a cobbler and other commoners?
Julius Caesar opens with a scene where some workmen are partying on because Caesar has defeated the sons of Pompey. Basically, any excuse for a party, right? But a couple of tribunes object because this was a civil war and Pompey was not only a Roman but a great one at that. Caesar will later have these tribunes strangled without trial (because he is not a bloodthirsty dictator, right?). You will notice that none of the important characters in the play appear in this scene. Shakespeare often delayed the appearance of the main characters to the second scene to give the audience a chance to settle down, realize the play had started, grab a beer etc. The scene, for those who were actually paying attention, tells the audience that Caesar is the kind of leader who is idolized by the ignorant and unthinking, but who alarms, offends and even frightens the thinking part of the population. This perspective makes Brutus and Cassius's conversation which follows more comprehensible. (To say nothing of Antony's funeral speech)
Why was Caesar allowed to become ruler of rome?
Caesar won the right to become ruler of Rome by winning the civil war with Pompey. Pompey was commissioned by the senate, and as Caesar defeated Pompey, he also, in effect, defeated the senate.Caesar won the right to become ruler of Rome by winning the civil war with Pompey. Pompey was commissioned by the senate, and as Caesar defeated Pompey, he also, in effect, defeated the senate.Caesar won the right to become ruler of Rome by winning the civil war with Pompey. Pompey was commissioned by the senate, and as Caesar defeated Pompey, he also, in effect, defeated the senate.Caesar won the right to become ruler of Rome by winning the civil war with Pompey. Pompey was commissioned by the senate, and as Caesar defeated Pompey, he also, in effect, defeated the senate.Caesar won the right to become ruler of Rome by winning the civil war with Pompey. Pompey was commissioned by the senate, and as Caesar defeated Pompey, he also, in effect, defeated the senate.Caesar won the right to become ruler of Rome by winning the civil war with Pompey. Pompey was commissioned by the senate, and as Caesar defeated Pompey, he also, in effect, defeated the senate.Caesar won the right to become ruler of Rome by winning the civil war with Pompey. Pompey was commissioned by the senate, and as Caesar defeated Pompey, he also, in effect, defeated the senate.Caesar won the right to become ruler of Rome by winning the civil war with Pompey. Pompey was commissioned by the senate, and as Caesar defeated Pompey, he also, in effect, defeated the senate.Caesar won the right to become ruler of Rome by winning the civil war with Pompey. Pompey was commissioned by the senate, and as Caesar defeated Pompey, he also, in effect, defeated the senate.
Why is Shakespeare going to such lengths to try to warn Caesar?
Shakespeare was not trying to warn Caesar who died 16 centuries before he was born. Are you asking what the dramatic effect is of the warning Caesar receives from the soothsayer and from Calpurnia? Dramatically, Caesar's reaction to the warnings may show him to be conceited and arrogant (or confident and level-headed, if you like him).
What is the effect of the strom and its purpose in Julius Caesar?
The storm in Julius Caesar reflects both the troubles occurring within the Roman state, and the internal conflict occurring within Brutus as to whether the assassination is best for the state.
Should Caesar have been assassinated in the play Julius Caesar?
Murdering people is not only illegal, it is, pretty much by common consent, wrong. There have been many people who have advocated violence as a means to effect social change. In the case of Caesar, Brutus was persuaded to join the conspiracy by the argument that this bit of violence would stop the tendency of the Roman government to appoint one strong leader to rule instead of the Republican Senate. It had no such effect; Caesar was merely replaced by an even stronger leader in the person of his nephew the Emperor Augustus.
What reforms did Julius Caesar have for Rome What effect did they have?
Julius Caesar instituted a number of reforms, some of which seem to have been aimed at increasing his own power. But one thing he did that had lasting and important effect was to turn Italy into a single province and tie the provinces more closely to the central government. There is a link below for more information.
What caused the bus boycotts and what was the impact on civil rights?
A cause of the montgomery bus boycott was Rosa Parks refusing to move on the segregated buses and an effect was that buses became unsegregated
What is the effect of Marc Antony's speech after the death of Caesar?
After Marc Antony's speech after Caesar's death civil unrest broke out.After Marc Antony's speech after Caesar's death civil unrest broke out.After Marc Antony's speech after Caesar's death civil unrest broke out.After Marc Antony's speech after Caesar's death civil unrest broke out.After Marc Antony's speech after Caesar's death civil unrest broke out.After Marc Antony's speech after Caesar's death civil unrest broke out.After Marc Antony's speech after Caesar's death civil unrest broke out.After Marc Antony's speech after Caesar's death civil unrest broke out.After Marc Antony's speech after Caesar's death civil unrest broke out.
Who did Caesar rule with?
When Caesar was elected consul, his partner was Marcus Bilbulus, who refused cooperation. At this same time, the agreement called the first triumvirate came to light. So in effect he was ruling with Crassus and Pompey. Afterwards, as dictator he ruled alone.
What was one effect of the year 46 BC having fifteen months and being 445 days long?
It made it possible for Caesar to introduce the Julian calendar.
How is Julius Caesar a reflection of the political anxiety present in Elizabethan England?
Julius Caesar is a play about attempting to effect political change by assassination. An attempt of this nature was carried out in 1597 by the Earl of Essex, shortly before this play was written. The play supports the passage of power through family ties (from Julius Caesar to his adopted son Octavian) which was the most peaceful form of transition the Elizabethans could hope for.
Caesar yields to calpurnia's wishes at first Why does he change his mind and decide to go?
Calphurnia's incessant pleadings caused Caesar to decide upon staying behind. But, Decius Brutus arrived on the scene. He undid all the effect of Calphurnia and the interpretation of her dream. He told that blood oozing out from Caesar and hundreds of Romans bathing their hands in it meant that Rome shall draw its power and energy from Caesar and people will ask for his blood stain, hair and his belongings to keep as a memento which they shall later mention in their will bequeathing it to their children. This flattered Caesar who now considered Calphurnia's fear as senseless and became determined to go to the Capitol.
Who seemed to be useless to others i n Julius Caesar?
Julius Caesar was not lovable. His generosity to defeated opponents, magnanimous though it was, did not win their affection. He won his soldiers' devotion by the victories that his intellectual ability, applied to warfare, brought them. Yet, though not lovable, Caesar was and is attractive, indeed fascinating. His political achievement required ability, in effect amounting to genius, in several different fields, including administration and general ship besides the minor arts of wire pulling and propaganda. In all these, Caesar was a supreme virtuoso
