Shakespeare was with the same company from 1594 to his retirement in 1613. It was called the Lord Chamberlain's Men to 1603 when the king took over the patronage and it was renamed the King's Men. Before 1594 he was with one or more other companies but we are not sure which: possibly Lord Strange's Men, or Sussex's, or Worcester's.
Shakespeare did not sponsor any theatre companies. He was not a member of the aristocracy, and only aristocrats and royalty could sponsor theatre companies. There was never any company called "Shakespeare's Men".
He did belong to a theatre company sponsored by the Lord Chamberlain Baron Hunsdon, which was later sponsored by King James I
Henry Carey, Lord Hunsdon, and Lord Chancellor of England was the patron. When he died, his son, George, succeeded him as Lord Hunsdon and, eventually, as Lord Chamberlain.
The compan's original patron was Lord Hunsdon, who was the Lord Chamberlain to Queen Elizabeth I. In 1603, the new king, James I, became its new patron.
a company called Lord Chamberlains Men
Shakespeare had nothing to do with the name of the acting company he co-founded. The name was given by the company's patron or sponsor. When the patron changed, so did the name of the company.
The Globe.
st. jude
The acting company that Shakespeare was with for most of his working life changed its name to the king's men in 1603 when King James succeeded to the throne and took over sponsorship of the company.
Shakespeare belonged to an acting company.
Shakespeare had nothing to do with the name of the acting company he co-founded. The name was given by the company's patron or sponsor. When the patron changed, so did the name of the company.
The Globe.
st. jude
The acting company that Shakespeare was with for most of his working life changed its name to the king's men in 1603 when King James succeeded to the throne and took over sponsorship of the company.
Shakespeare belonged to an acting company.
Shakespeare did not name the acting group he belonged to. Elizabethan theatre groups did not name themselves; they were required by law to have a noble or royal patron and the theatre group took its name from that person. If the patron changed his title, the name of the company changed; if the patron was replaced by someone else (as happened with the company Shakespeare belonged to) then the name of the company changed. Even if the theatre company has some say in what they were called, and they didn't, Shakespeare was not the leader of the company. The brothers Richard and Cuthbert Burbage were the leaders. The patrons of the company were Henry Carey, the Lord Chamberlain and King James I.
He was a member of an acting company.
Shakespeare's acting company was first known as Lord Chamberlain's Men. The name was changed to The Kings Men in 1603 when King James I ascended the throne and became the company's patron.
The company was The Lord Chamberlain's Men until 1603 when they became The King's Men.
Elizabethan acting companies took the names of their patrons--by law, no acting company could exist unless it was sponsored by a noble or royal patron. This was automatic; neither Shakespeare nor anyone else could change the name of the company. The name of the company did not "honor" anyone, it showed who was giving the actors legal protection.
The acting company to which Shakespeare belonged for most of his working life was called The Lord Chamberlain's Men from 1594-1603, and The King's Men after that. Shakespeare was not the troupe's leader, but rather a partner.
bb marly