Shakespeare had nothing to do with the name of the acting company he co-founded. The name was given by the company's patron or sponsor. When the patron changed, so did the name of the company.
The Globe.
st. jude
The acting company that Shakespeare was with for most of his working life changed its name to the king's men in 1603 when King James succeeded to the throne and took over sponsorship of the company.
The Lord Chamberlain who was the patron for Shakespeare's acting company was Henry Carey, the 1st Baron Hunsdon. He served as Lord Chamberlain from 1585 until his death in 1596 and supported the Lord Chamberlain's Men, the acting company to which Shakespeare belonged. Under his patronage, the company flourished and performed many of Shakespeare's plays.
Shakespeare had nothing to do with the name of the acting company he co-founded. The name was given by the company's patron or sponsor. When the patron changed, so did the name of the company.
The Globe.
st. jude
The acting company that Shakespeare was with for most of his working life changed its name to the king's men in 1603 when King James succeeded to the throne and took over sponsorship of the company.
The Lord Chamberlain who was the patron for Shakespeare's acting company was Henry Carey, the 1st Baron Hunsdon. He served as Lord Chamberlain from 1585 until his death in 1596 and supported the Lord Chamberlain's Men, the acting company to which Shakespeare belonged. Under his patronage, the company flourished and performed many of Shakespeare's plays.
Shakespeare belonged to an acting company.
Shakespeare did not name the acting group he belonged to. Elizabethan theatre groups did not name themselves; they were required by law to have a noble or royal patron and the theatre group took its name from that person. If the patron changed his title, the name of the company changed; if the patron was replaced by someone else (as happened with the company Shakespeare belonged to) then the name of the company changed. Even if the theatre company has some say in what they were called, and they didn't, Shakespeare was not the leader of the company. The brothers Richard and Cuthbert Burbage were the leaders. The patrons of the company were Henry Carey, the Lord Chamberlain and King James I.
Shakespeare's acting company was first known as Lord Chamberlain's Men. The name was changed to The Kings Men in 1603 when King James I ascended the throne and became the company's patron.
He was a member of an acting company.
The company was The Lord Chamberlain's Men until 1603 when they became The King's Men.
Elizabethan acting companies took the names of their patrons--by law, no acting company could exist unless it was sponsored by a noble or royal patron. This was automatic; neither Shakespeare nor anyone else could change the name of the company. The name of the company did not "honor" anyone, it showed who was giving the actors legal protection.
The acting company to which Shakespeare belonged for most of his working life was called The Lord Chamberlain's Men from 1594-1603, and The King's Men after that. Shakespeare was not the troupe's leader, but rather a partner.