answersLogoWhite

0

There are only two images of Shakespeare which we know to have been approved and described as accurate by people who actually knew him--one is the funeral monument in Stratford Church which his family erected, and the other is the engraving by Droushout which appears at the becinning of the First Folio and is far and away the most famous image of Shakespeare. There is also the Chandos portrait which is far and away the best-authenticated painting of Shakespeare. Using these images historians have told artists what they think he looked like and then they painted or have drawn it.

From the Droushout portrait especially we get the image of a huge head against a starched ruff (you know, the pleated white collar), a frail body, a protruding forehead, and a crescent-shaped scar below his right eye (which might just be a bag under his eye). He was bald (all the images show him as such), and his hair was dark, probably black. He wore a small beard and moustache although full beards were the fashion.

Periodically, someone claims that an Elizabethan portrait of an unknown gentleman is really of Shakespeare. The evidence for that can be pretty thin, and often the portrait looks nothing like the images we know to have been of Shakespeare. An example is the Cobbe portrait, which shows a man with a small head, a full beard, a full head of fawn-coloured hair and a low sloping forehead. He had a moustace, a monobrow, and a scar from when he fell off a wall he also had one foot bigger than the other

User Avatar

Eula O'Hara

Lvl 10
4y ago

What else can I help you with?