answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It's likely that if we were to see performances in Elizabethan England we would find them very stilted and affected, but during Shakespeare's time there was a definite move towards acting in a more natural way. Until just a few years before Shakespeare started his career in the theatre, plays were typically of a sort called "morality" plays or "miracle" plays and masques. These were primarily rhetorical and allegorical, appealing to intellect rather than emotion for the most part. It was only in the latter half of the sixteenth century in which most actors began performing in ways that were meant to imitate life and evoke a variety of emotions - they were beginning, in Hamlet's words, to hold a "mirror up to nature" . From Hamlet's directions to the acting troupe you can get an idea of how performers used to act and how the notions of good performances were shifting towards more natural methods:

Speak the speech, I pray you, as I pronounced it to you, trippingly on the tongue. But if you mouth it, as many of your players do, I had as lief the town-crier had spoke my lines. Nor do not saw the air too much with your hand, thus, but use all gently . . . Be not too tame neither, but let your own discretion be your tutor. Suit the action to the word, the word to the action, with this special observance, that you o'erstep not the modesty of nature.

(Hamlet, III, ii, 1-18)

Shakespeare's sentiments here are perhaps the best indication of how a quality performance was judged by people back then.

There were also famous actors just as there are today. Celebrities who, once they gained fame, were given the best roles and drew bigger audiences.

Some of Shakespeare's earliest involvement with the theatre was as an actor.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were the performers like in Shakespeares time?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp