Women did not participate in Shakespearean plays. All roles, including female ones, were played by men.
Males
They were not allowed to be godfather to someone's children.
None. It was against the law for women to act in this time in history.
0 because women were not allowed to be actors because it was "too revealing"
I don't know what Elizabeth you are speaking of, but I presume it was because she was a female Shakespearean actress who was acting after the year 1660 sometime. Sometimes actresses play the male roles in Shakespeare as well.
Young boys played the role of women.
my mum
Males
men
women were equal with men because the queen was a woman
They were not allowed to be godfather to someone's children.
Women were not allowed to act on stage.
None. It was against the law for women to act in this time in history.
In Shakespeare's time, all female roles were played by young boys or men because women were not allowed to perform on stage. This was a common practice due to societal norms and restrictions at the time.
The way the women's roles and opportunities in the 1950s differ from women's roles today is in the 1950s women roles was mostly raising a family and housekeeping. Today, women play a part in public offices and workplace and person growth/community.
Usually men would play the part of women as women hardly had any power during that of an era.
Women were barred from the stage. Female parts were acted by Boy Players whose voices had not deepened through puberty. Some were apprentices learning the art of acting as a profession. On occasion older men might play comic women characters in the same way that Monty Python or Tyler Perry do women's roles.