There were a few known theatres around, including the Rose Theatre just down the street from the Globe, and the Hope and Swan, also in Southwark. Quite often companies performed in inns and local spaces. Most companies toured their shows, very few got royal patronage, so somewhere like the Globe was big and had very few major compeititors. The biggest competitors were the Lord Admiral's Men, with their star actor Ned Alleyn, who in 1600 built the Fortune Theatre in Shoreditch. Unfortunately over time the Fortune, which was bigger and fancier than the Globe, and the other northern theatres such as the Red Bull got a bad reputation. They were seen as rowdy and uncivilised, where the unwashed masses would go to drink, have fun, watch a raunchy show, and maybe get into a fistfight afterwards. This reputation did not affect the Southwark theatres as much.
the modern theatres are proberly safer then the globe theatre.
No, the Rose theatre and the Globe theatre are two different theatres. The Rose theatre opened before the Globe theatre in 1587, and the Globe theatre opened afterwards in 1599. The Rose theatre closed in 1605, whereas the Globe Theatre was burnt down in 1613, rebuilt in 1614 and then closed in 1642. Both theatres are now rebuilt and open to the public.
He owned a share in two theatres: The Globe and The Blackfriars. His share was usually one-eighth.
Nothing. The Globe theatre was one of the Elizabethan theatres. Think of "Elizabethan" as a time or type, not an actual theatre with that name.
People went to the Globe Theatre for the same reason people go to theatres now: to watch plays.
the modern theatres are proberly safer then the globe theatre.
its smaller
No, the Rose theatre and the Globe theatre are two different theatres. The Rose theatre opened before the Globe theatre in 1587, and the Globe theatre opened afterwards in 1599. The Rose theatre closed in 1605, whereas the Globe Theatre was burnt down in 1613, rebuilt in 1614 and then closed in 1642. Both theatres are now rebuilt and open to the public.
He owned a share in two theatres: The Globe and The Blackfriars. His share was usually one-eighth.
In a modern theatre the audience sits opposite to the stage. In the globe the audience sits (partly) around the stage, in the manner of the ancient Greek theatres.
Nothing. The Globe theatre was one of the Elizabethan theatres. Think of "Elizabethan" as a time or type, not an actual theatre with that name.
Yes he was a part-owner of two theatres, the Globe and the Blackfriars.
People went to the Globe Theatre for the same reason people go to theatres now: to watch plays.
Two theatres: the Globe and the Blackfriars.
it look cooler and bigger
The original Globe Theatre had no electricity laid on. All the lighting was natural sunlight. All modern theatres have provision for a huge number of electric lights. Also, there were no bathrooms for the audience at the original Globe. Thankfully that has been changed in all modern theatres.
The new Globe Theatre in London has the same kind of air conditioning as Shakespeare's Globe had. It's called wind. Both theatres are in the open air.