Mark Antony
Caesar is not able to swim accross the Tiber river and cassius can
Sorry, line numbers mean nothing; they are different from edition to edition of the play and they start again at one at the beginning of every scene. Without knowing what edition or scene you are talking about, it is like asking what is five miles away without saying from what. You are better off to quote the beginning of the first line, which will enable the answerer to find the passage you refer to.
Lennox Suggest that Macbeth is both a Murderer and a Tryant
what does Fleance's escape suggest about Macbeth's luck
They suggest rearranging the word order of the line
Caesar is not able to swim accross the Tiber river and cassius can
The Battle of Philippi, fought in 42 BCE between the forces of Mark Antony and Octavian against the army of Brutus and Cassius, resulted in significant casualties. Estimates suggest that around 20,000 soldiers were killed in the battles, with the majority on the side of Brutus and Cassius. The defeat of the conspirators led to their eventual suicides, marking a pivotal moment in the power struggle following Julius Caesar's assassination.
So they will not argue in front of their armies
he sees Antony as a weak person who will confess to the crime after
No, George Washington did not assassinate a French soldier. Throughout his military career and presidency, there is no historical evidence to suggest that Washington was involved in any acts of assassination.
There was no group such as 'The Jews'. The Nazis tried to suggest that there was a global Jewish conspiracy, but there was no system i which Jews from different places were bound together. So 'The Jews' did not ever plan to assassinate Hitler.
In 'The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,' Brutus suggests the conspirators bathe their hands in Caesar's blood before going to the market place. They are then to carry their bloodied swords to the market, and proclaim peace, freedom, and liberty.
The Gunpowder Plot of 1605 was not framed; it was a genuine conspiracy by a group of English Catholics, including Guy Fawkes, to blow up the Houses of Parliament and assassinate King James I. Their aim was to end Protestant rule and restore Catholicism in England. The plot was discovered before it could be executed, leading to the arrest and execution of the conspirators. While some theories suggest that government spies may have played a role in its exposure, the plot itself was a real attempt to instigate a political and religious change.
Mary Surratt's involvement in the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln is often attributed to her association with Confederate sympathizers and her son, John Surratt, who was involved in the conspiracy. Some historians suggest she may have been motivated by her strong anti-Union sentiments and a desire to support the Confederate cause. Additionally, her boarding house served as a meeting place for Booth and other conspirators, indicating her potential complicity in their plans. However, the exact reasons behind her actions remain a subject of debate.
Suggest you Google search, for details, but basically, a large caliber, small frame piece, originally by Webley, but extensively copied. I believe it was available in a variety of calibers. Purported to have been used to assassinate Pres. Garfield.
This is a very broad question, but I will give my take on it. One aspect of Cassius is his machiavellian plotting, driven by jealousy and hatred of Caesar. This interpretation would suggest that Shakespeare is using the character of Cassius to comment on this dangerous aspect of human nature. There are, however, several more complex layers to this character. Ironically, it is Cassius, not the noble Brutus, who seems to truly value human relationships. It seems that Cassius surrenders to Brutus' weaker judgments regarding the conspiracy because he values their friendship so deeply. It can be argued that his hatred for Caesar and his love of Brutus are the two most powerful forces driving Cassius throughout the play. This interpretation would suggest that Shakespeare is also using Cassius to comment on the manner in which personal relationships compel people to take extreme actions. Shakespeare may also be using Cassius as a means to comment on the nature of political reform. Shakespeare extensively read Machiavelli, and Cassius' character seems to reflect Machiavelli's theory that certain individuals carry the desire to dominate and subjugate the people and are kept in check only by others with similar ambition. This raises an important question about humanity. Is tyranny kept at bay only by jealousy? Cassius also plays a vital role in Shakespeare's discussion of the human view of fate and destiny. He is the character who utters the famous lines "the fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars but in ourselves that we are underlings." Cassius wants to believe that he has control over his own destiny, so much so that he embraces suicide as a noble means of freeing oneself from gnoble circumstances. It seems that Shakespeare is using Cassius to comment on the tendency for humans to feel that they are "masters of their fates." I hope this helps.
Suggest you Google search, for details, but basically, a large caliber, small frame piece, originally by Webley, but extensively copied. I believe it was available in a variety of calibers. Purported to have been used to assassinate Pres. Garfield.