In Shakespeare's play Richard III, Richard kills Edward son of Henry VI, Henry VI himself, Clarence, Rivers, Grey, Vaughan, Hastings, his nephew Edward V, his nephew Richard, his wife, and the Duke of Buckingham, the ghosts of whom all rise to plague him on the night before Bosworth Field. In reality, Clarence was executed for very real treason against his brother Edward, Rivers and Grey were executed for treasonably attempting to abduct the princes Edward and Richard, and Hastings was implicated in the same crime. Buckingham led a revolt against Richard and so naturally was executed for treason. The only deaths for which Richard can reasonably be held to account are those of his nephews Edward and Richard who entered the Tower prior to Richard's proclaimation as king and were never seen again.
Also, Henry Tudor kills Richard at the Battle of Bosworth Field.
stabbed
hi Richard 111 locked up his nephew's so he could become king then he killed them
In a word, yes. He is supposed to have killed his nephews Edward and Richard, sons of his brother King Edward IV.
Because Richard III fought a battle with Elizabeth's grandfather, Henry Tudor, in which Richard was killed (the Battle of Bosworth) and Henry took the crown as Henry VII. Richard was supposed to have been responsible for murdering the boy King Edward V and his little brother - the so-called Princes In The Tower. (Young Edward and his brother were the brothers of Elizabeth of York, Henry VII's wife). Therefore the Tudors hated Richard III and would be pleased with any propaganda against him. Shakespeare's play Richard III, helped to give Richard a bad name!
Is it because the lead character in all three is killed in the play and no other Shakepeare lead characters are killed in their play In All four plays, there is a ghost that appears
it was Henry VII
stabbed
Harold II Richard the Lionheart Richard III
He was killed at the Battle of Bosworth, 22nd August 1485
He is killed off-stage on Richard's orders, not by a specific (identified) person.
hi Richard 111 locked up his nephew's so he could become king then he killed them
The play is about Richard III, man who had been made guardian for a very young king, Edward V, who was 12. He is believed to have killed Edward, but certainly Edward disappeared and Richard took control of the kingdom. He did not last long, and was killed two years later at the Battle of Bosworth.
Richard III didn't actually kill everyone. Athough there has been speculation that he killed his nephews (The Princes in the Tower) and his wife, as well as ministers and his subjects, there is not proof that he killed "everyone". Most of it was made up by the Tudors, who defeated Richard III in battle (Bosworth Field).
No. Richard III was killed at the Battle of Bosworth Field by Henry Tudor (later known as Henry VII), and Henry Tudor took the English Crown.
Henry the Seventh, the first Tudor monarch, who killed Richard III at Bosworth.
In a word, yes. He is supposed to have killed his nephews Edward and Richard, sons of his brother King Edward IV.
Edward III was not killed as a prince. He lived a long and fertile life, having a large number of sons, and being succeeded by his grandson when he died of old age. There has never been a Richard VI. If you mean Edward V, say so. He was killed as a prince before being crowned along with his brother Richard (who is never counted as a king)