Shakespeare did not make the change. Even if the company could have the right to change the name, Shakespeare did not have the right to speak for the company--Richard Burbage was its leader not Shakespeare.
The name was changed by King James I. When he came to the throne, he took over patronage of the company. When the patron changed, the name changed.
The acting company to which Shakespeare belonged for most of his working life was called The Lord Chamberlain's Men from 1594-1603, and The King's Men after that. Shakespeare was not the troupe's leader, but rather a partner.
The Lord Chamberlain's Men were the acting company which William Shakespeare belonged to. He performed with them, and his plays were the property of the company. The connection of the company with Shakespeare is what makes it significant.
They did not. They were formed as the Lord Chamberlain's Men in 1594. Their name changed to the King's Men (they did not have any choice in their name) when the King became their patron nine years later in 1603.
The owners of the Globe theatre were all members of the Lord Chamberlain's Men, including Richard and Cuthbert Burbage and William Shakespeare.
Shakespeare was most probably still in Stratford or the vicinity in 1584. It was prior to the birth of his twins. [He may have been tutoring home-schooled catholic families in Lincolnshire.] We only know that he moved to London sometime prior o 1592. He helped form Lord Hunsdon's Men who became the Lord Chamberlain's Men in 1594.
He joined the Lord Chamberlains men which later changed their name to the Kings Men.
Lord Chamberlains Men
no there not sorry
The acting company to which Shakespeare belonged for most of his working life was called The Lord Chamberlain's Men from 1594-1603, and The King's Men after that. Shakespeare was not the troupe's leader, but rather a partner.
The Lord Chamberlain's Men were the acting company which William Shakespeare belonged to. He performed with them, and his plays were the property of the company. The connection of the company with Shakespeare is what makes it significant.
They were the acting company with which he was associated for nearly twenty years.
They did not. They were formed as the Lord Chamberlain's Men in 1594. Their name changed to the King's Men (they did not have any choice in their name) when the King became their patron nine years later in 1603.
The owners of the Globe theatre were all members of the Lord Chamberlain's Men, including Richard and Cuthbert Burbage and William Shakespeare.
They are more commonly remembered as the King's Men.
There is no hard evidence to prove which companies Shakespeare worked with prior to helping to found The Lord Chamberlain's Men. The ususal suspects are Queen Elizabeth's Men, Pembroke's Men, Derby's Men, and Strange's Men, but that is just surmise.
Lord Chamberlains men
Shakespeare was most probably still in Stratford or the vicinity in 1584. It was prior to the birth of his twins. [He may have been tutoring home-schooled catholic families in Lincolnshire.] We only know that he moved to London sometime prior o 1592. He helped form Lord Hunsdon's Men who became the Lord Chamberlain's Men in 1594.