That's a matter of opinion; we could easily make the opposite argument.
No one was
It depends on where you are and who you are and it also depends on your definition of "famous". Nobody can interview everyone in the world to find out if they have heard of Shakespeare or not.
You mean his epitaph I suspect. Someone other than Shakespeare wrote it. Possibly his daughter.
Many Shakespeare fans would be horrified by the analogy but there are parallels. Shakespeare was cranking out popular entertainment for the masses, while the art of the time was being done by the university poets. * Before it is pointed out that Walt Disney died in the 1960's, this contributor interpreted the question to be about the respective legacies of William Shakespeare and Walt Disney, not merely the individuals and what they achieved in life.
It is pretty hard to describe them better than Shakespeare already did.
Time will tell, but as it stands, the likely answer is "Shakespeare". Walt Disney's contributions to entertainment are generally "lighter" than Shakespeare's.
No one was
Yes.
Shakespeare
Shakespeare was a writer. Alleyn was not. Alleyn was, however, a much better actor than Shakespeare in the view of their contemporaries.
It depends on where you are and who you are and it also depends on your definition of "famous". Nobody can interview everyone in the world to find out if they have heard of Shakespeare or not.
Nickelodeon is better than Disney. Nickelodeon is more funnier and has more views of their website more than 1,000 people visit nick.com a day! That is more than Disney! But still Disney is a good website and channel.
yes
no it isn't
well i did my research and according to the world Disney channel is bettter than nickelodeon but 3/4ths of those people think the old Disney channel is better than new so i made a new vote old Disney vs old nickelodeon and nick Disney channel-953,264 this might shock you nickelodeon-1,002365 so clearly nickelodeon is better than old Disney and new bye bye peeps
They are not really unique. There are many many plays by Shakespeare's contemporaries, many of which are better than the worst of Shakespeare's plays. Shakespeare was just one of a large number of people writing plays. But what history has shown is that Shakespeare, when he was on his game, was a far better playwright than any of his contemporaries and anyone else before or since. He was not unique, but he was and is the best.
In my opinion, yes.