0
What else can I help you with?
What is a command interpreter and why is it separate from the kernel?
A command interpreter is an interface of the operating system with the user. The user gives commands with are executed by operating system (usually by turning them into system calls). The main function of a command interpreter is to get and execute the next user specified command. Command-Interpreter is usually not part of the kernel, since multiple command interpreters (shell, in UNIX terminology) may be support by an operating system, and they do not really need to run in kernel mode. There are two main advantages to separating the command interpreter from the kernel. 1. If we want to change the way the command interpreter looks, i.e., I want to change the interface of command interpreter, I am able to do that if the command interpreter is separate from the kernel. I cannot change the code of the kernel so I cannot modify the interface. 2. If the command interpreter is a part of the kernel it is possible for a malicious process to gain access to certain part of the kernel that it showed not have to avoid this ugly scenario it is advantageous to have the command interpreter separate from kernel
Would it be possible for the user to develop a new command interpreter using the system call interface provided by the operating system?
It reads commands from the user or from a file of commands and executes them, usually by turning them into one or more system calls. It is usually not part of the kernel since the command interpreter is subject to changes. An user should be able to develop a new command interpreter using the system-call interface provided by the operating system. The command interpreter allows an user to create and manage processes and also determine ways by which they communicate (such as through pipes and files). As all of this functionality could be accessed by an user-level program using the system calls, so it should be possible for the user to develop a new command-line interpreter.
Would it be possible for the user to develop a new command interpreter using system call interface provided by the operating system?
It reads commands from the user or from a file of commands and executes them, usually by turning them into one or more system calls. It is usually not part of the kernel since the command interpreter is subject to changes. An user should be able to develop a new command interpreter using the system-call interface provided by the operating system. The command interpreter allows an user to create and manage processes and also determine ways by which they communicate (such as through pipes and files). As all of this functionality could be accessed by an user-level program using the system calls, so it should be possible for the user to develop a new command-line interpreter.
Is shell a part of the operating system?
No. It is easier to alter shell when it is not part of the operating system. Answer: its easier but the real answer is shell is not part of Operating system as it is command prompt use to operate operating system and its part of disk operating system
What is the purpose of the command interpreter?
It reads commands from the user or from a file of commands and executes them, usually by turning them into one or more system calls. It is usually not part of the kernel since the command interpreter is subject to changes.
What is a command interpreter and why is it separate from the kernel?
A command interpreter is an interface of the operating system with the user. The user gives commands with are executed by operating system (usually by turning them into system calls). The main function of a command interpreter is to get and execute the next user specified command. Command-Interpreter is usually not part of the kernel, since multiple command interpreters (shell, in UNIX terminology) may be support by an operating system, and they do not really need to run in kernel mode. There are two main advantages to separating the command interpreter from the kernel. 1. If we want to change the way the command interpreter looks, i.e., I want to change the interface of command interpreter, I am able to do that if the command interpreter is separate from the kernel. I cannot change the code of the kernel so I cannot modify the interface. 2. If the command interpreter is a part of the kernel it is possible for a malicious process to gain access to certain part of the kernel that it showed not have to avoid this ugly scenario it is advantageous to have the command interpreter separate from kernel
Would it be possible for the user to develop a new command interpreter using the system call interface provided by the operating system?
It reads commands from the user or from a file of commands and executes them, usually by turning them into one or more system calls. It is usually not part of the kernel since the command interpreter is subject to changes. An user should be able to develop a new command interpreter using the system-call interface provided by the operating system. The command interpreter allows an user to create and manage processes and also determine ways by which they communicate (such as through pipes and files). As all of this functionality could be accessed by an user-level program using the system calls, so it should be possible for the user to develop a new command-line interpreter.
Would it be possible for the user to develop a new command interpreter using system call interface provided by the operating system?
It reads commands from the user or from a file of commands and executes them, usually by turning them into one or more system calls. It is usually not part of the kernel since the command interpreter is subject to changes. An user should be able to develop a new command interpreter using the system-call interface provided by the operating system. The command interpreter allows an user to create and manage processes and also determine ways by which they communicate (such as through pipes and files). As all of this functionality could be accessed by an user-level program using the system calls, so it should be possible for the user to develop a new command-line interpreter.
Is shell a part of the operating system?
No. It is easier to alter shell when it is not part of the operating system. Answer: its easier but the real answer is shell is not part of Operating system as it is command prompt use to operate operating system and its part of disk operating system
Is shell a part of operating system?
No. It is easier to alter shell when it is not part of the operating system. Answer: its easier but the real answer is shell is not part of Operating system as it is command prompt use to operate operating system and its part of disk operating system
What is the purpose of the command interpreter?
It reads commands from the user or from a file of commands and executes them, usually by turning them into one or more system calls. It is usually not part of the kernel since the command interpreter is subject to changes.
What is the purpose command interpreter?
It reads commands from the user or from a file of commands and executes them, usually by turning them into one or more system calls. It is usually not part of the kernel since the command interpreter is subject to changes.
What is the purpose command Interpreter and why it is usually separate from the kernel?
It reads commands from the user or from a file of commands and executes them, usually by turning them into one or more system calls. It is usually not part of the kernel since the command interpreter is subject to changes.
Why is the shell not part of the operating system itself?
Operating systems do 2 things: (1). Providing an easier abstraction layer (system calls) for user programs to access the real HW machine. (2). It manages the system resource. It this view, the shell is not considered as part of the operating system because: (1). It acts as a interpreter(from user command to system calls) only, and (2). It runs in user mode, and (3). It is highly possible to replace the shell if you don't like one.
Why some times command line interpreter are not the part of the kernel?
Not integrating the command interpreter into the kernel allows for easier replacement and customization. It can also increase reliability.
Part of operating system?
How is a memory-resident part of an operating system different from a nonresident part of an operating system?
What is the part of the operating system we interact with when using a computer?
operating system
