Because it's not scientific, its actually an very old legal principle.
NoIt proves why he sang and wrote a song about him being ginger!!!!!!!
This proves that there is no such thing as spontaneous generation.
Claudio
he bought the second biggest house at statford
One of many examples is, "Oh God! God! How weary, stale, flat and unprofitable seem to me all the uses of this world."
The scientific method is useful because it lets you know if you are right or wrong when trying to solve a problem or a scientific question you might have. It proves that something is science or not.
The scientific method is useful because it lets you know if you are right or wrong when trying to solve a problem or a scientific question you might have. It proves that something is science or not.
Not really, if the theory proves to be wrong then it is replaced by something better (using the scientific method)..
The word proves in this context means "tests the validity of." The expression is generally misunderstood to mean that the exception somehow demonstrates the validity of the rule.
The scientific method is useful because it lets you know if you are right or wrong when trying to solve a problem or a scientific question you might have. It proves that something is science or not.
Some one proves it wrong.
Not EVERY rule, but most of them. Hence the saying, 'the exception that proves the rule.'
some people believe there were, but there is no scientific evidence that proves the existence of these creatures.
No, there is no scientific evidence that directly proves that ghosts exist. It is just folklore.
The Socratic method is contradictionism, where the philosopher deliberately contradicts popular beliefs and proves them wrong.
I don't think there is. Science can only prove what can be observed.
The Socratic method is contradictionism, where the philosopher deliberately contradicts popular beliefs and proves them wrong.