If it is worthwhile to teach people how to use the language effectively, it would be foolish not to have a look at the greatest writer ever in the English language. Shakespeare's work is so important to us culturally that the numerous allusions made to it in popular culture would go right over the head of someone who has not been exposed to Shakespeare, and they would miss a lot of what is going on.
That being said, unfortunately there are many teachers out there who think that a course on Shakespeare should be called "Why You Should Hate Shakespeare". They put a lot of effort into getting students to look at Shakespeare's plays as badly written and incomprehensible novels, to be afraid of his language (and then to offer "No Fear" versions with the language stripped away), and to use strange and artificial concepts like "tragic hero", "Freytag's Pyramid", and "hubris" to confuse them as to what is really happening. Such teaching methods do more harm than good.
The line is from The Tempest by William Shakespeare, it should read;You taught me language; and my profit on'tIs, I know how to curse
Latin
Shakespeare's words, phrases and the stories that he dramatized are deeply imbedded in our language and culture. Literature, theatre and film is full of constant references to Shakespeare's work in one way or another. If you cannot understand these, then you miss out on a great deal of culture in the English-speaking world.
Yes, clearly Shakespeare learned to read and write in English. This was probably taught in primary school before he advanced to grammar school.
What do you mean if Shakespeare have it? If you mean does Shakespeare have what it takes, then yes. He should any way.
The line is from The Tempest by William Shakespeare, it should read;You taught me language; and my profit on'tIs, I know how to curse
There is no record of the name of Shakespeare's teacher when he attended grammar school. He was certainly not taught by the Ben Johnson who was a Canadian sprinter. He was also certainly not taught by Ben Jonson (please note the spelling), the playwright, who was younger than Shakespeare.
Latin
Before the plays were regularly taught in schools (and only very few of them are taught in schools), people knew Shakespeare's plays from watching them be performed. It's still the best way to get to know them.
Shakespeare's words, phrases and the stories that he dramatized are deeply imbedded in our language and culture. Literature, theatre and film is full of constant references to Shakespeare's work in one way or another. If you cannot understand these, then you miss out on a great deal of culture in the English-speaking world.
Yes, clearly Shakespeare learned to read and write in English. This was probably taught in primary school before he advanced to grammar school.
The serious answer: because they are fascinating and amazing works of literature. The answer that first came to my head: sowe can passour English exams. speaking of which i should revise..... lol
taught
A teacher whose name we do not know.
Shakespeare learned the basic subjects that were taught during his life time. It's likely that he could read Latin by age 8, as was expected back then.
What do you mean if Shakespeare have it? If you mean does Shakespeare have what it takes, then yes. He should any way.
they should be taught multiplication tables and basic spelling