An example of an ampliative argument is: "All observed swans are white, so all swans are white." This argument makes a generalization based on limited evidence.
The key difference between ampliative and deductive arguments is that deductive arguments aim to guarantee the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true, while ampliative arguments only provide probable support for the conclusion based on the premises.
All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
One famous example of deductive reasoning is the philosophical argument known as "Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal." This syllogism clearly demonstrates deductive reasoning through a series of logical steps leading to a specific conclusion.
Sure, you count the apples in a basket, for example. Inductively, you found that there are five. Now, if you were to give an answer as to one of them being a part of a set of all the apples in a basket, you would have to say that it is a part of a set consisting of five apples.
A deductive argument is one where the premises attempt to prove the truth of the conclusion. eg. All kittens like to play with yarn. Furry Frank is a kitten. Therefore, Furry Frank likes to play with yarn. An inductive argument is one where the premises attempt to prove the likelihood of the conclusion. eg. My kitten likes to play with yarn. Your kitten likes to play with yarn. His kitten likes to play with yarn. Therefore, all kittens like to play with yarn.
An example of deductive reasoning is: All men are mortal. John is a man. Therefore, John is mortal. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on general premises or facts.
This statement is an example of a deductive argument. It presents a logical sequence of reasoning where the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises.
All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
One famous example of deductive reasoning is the philosophical argument known as "Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal." This syllogism clearly demonstrates deductive reasoning through a series of logical steps leading to a specific conclusion.
Sure, you count the apples in a basket, for example. Inductively, you found that there are five. Now, if you were to give an answer as to one of them being a part of a set of all the apples in a basket, you would have to say that it is a part of a set consisting of five apples.
Deductive reasoning is a type of logical thinking where a specific conclusion is drawn from general principles or premises. An example of deductive reasoning is: All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
A deductive argument is one where the premises attempt to prove the truth of the conclusion. eg. All kittens like to play with yarn. Furry Frank is a kitten. Therefore, Furry Frank likes to play with yarn. An inductive argument is one where the premises attempt to prove the likelihood of the conclusion. eg. My kitten likes to play with yarn. Your kitten likes to play with yarn. His kitten likes to play with yarn. Therefore, all kittens like to play with yarn.
This argument is an example of logos, as it relies on logical reasoning to make a conclusion based on the premise that all plants can photosynthesize.
An example of deductive reasoning is: All men are mortal. John is a man. Therefore, John is mortal. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on general premises or facts.
inductive-deductive paragraph
If all humans are mortal, and Socrates is human, then Socrates is mortal. This is an example of deductive reasoning because it draws a specific conclusion based on general premises that are assumed to be true.
If John is a dragon, then John can both breathe fire and fly. John cannot both breathe fire and fly. Therefore, John is not a dragon.
Looking at how you have spelt reasoning (ie reasoing), it is possible to deduce that you are a careless person who does not check what they are writing. That is deductive reasoning.