Yes, though it wouldn't be a sound argument if it did so.
An argument with a missing premise or conclusion is called an enthymeme. It is an incomplete syllogism in which one of the premises or the conclusion is left unstated.
Yes, a deductive argument can have false premises. However, the conclusion does not follow logically if the premises are false, making the argument unsound.
Having true premises in constructing a valid argument is important because the validity of an argument depends on the truth of its premises. If the premises are not true, then the argument is not sound and cannot be relied upon to reach a valid conclusion. In other words, true premises are essential for ensuring that an argument is logically sound and can be considered valid.
Yes, an argument can be valid even if it contains false premises. Validity in an argument refers to the logical structure, where the conclusion follows logically from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or false.
If all the premises of an argument are true, then the conclusion drawn from those premises is likely to be valid and logically sound.
An argument with a missing premise or conclusion is called an enthymeme. It is an incomplete syllogism in which one of the premises or the conclusion is left unstated.
The most appropriate tactic is to try to identify the missing premises by considering what additional information is needed to make the argument logically sound. One approach is to ask questions to uncover the assumptions or missing elements that would strengthen the argument. Additionally, considering alternative perspectives and potential counterarguments can help in determining what unstated premises might be necessary for the argument to hold up.
Yes, a deductive argument can have false premises. However, the conclusion does not follow logically if the premises are false, making the argument unsound.
Having true premises in constructing a valid argument is important because the validity of an argument depends on the truth of its premises. If the premises are not true, then the argument is not sound and cannot be relied upon to reach a valid conclusion. In other words, true premises are essential for ensuring that an argument is logically sound and can be considered valid.
Yes, an argument can be valid even if it contains false premises. Validity in an argument refers to the logical structure, where the conclusion follows logically from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or false.
If all the premises of an argument are true, then the conclusion drawn from those premises is likely to be valid and logically sound.
If a deductive argument is valid and its premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This is because the structure of the argument guarantees that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must follow logically.
An argument is sound if it is valid (the conclusion logically follows from the premises) and all the premises are true. To determine if an argument is sound, you need to assess both its logical structure (validity) and the truth of its premises.
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Valid means that the argument leads to a true conclusion, given that its premises are true, but if an argument is valid that does not necessarily mean the conclusion is correct, as its premises may be wrong. A sound argument, on the other hand, in addition to being valid all of its premises are true and hence its conclusion is also true.
An argument is valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In a valid argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This can be determined by evaluating the logical structure of the argument.
The soundness of a deductive argument is determined by the validity of its logical structure and the truth of its premises. If the argument is logically valid and the premises are true, then the argument is considered sound.