answersLogoWhite

0

nozick = no welfare, taxes are stealing/slavery rawls= welfare for the poor thus redistribution of some wealth

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Philosophy

How do Rawls and Nozick compare and contrast in their theories of justice?

Rawls and Nozick both address the concept of justice, but they have different perspectives. Rawls focuses on distributive justice and the fair distribution of resources to benefit the least advantaged in society. Nozick, on the other hand, emphasizes individual rights and the importance of respecting property rights. While Rawls advocates for a more egalitarian society through redistribution, Nozick argues for minimal government intervention to protect individual liberties and property rights.


What is the difference between Aristotle and john rawls?

Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who focused on ethics and virtue theory, believing that individuals should strive for moral excellence to achieve eudaimonia (flourishing/happiness). John Rawls, on the other hand, was a 20th-century American philosopher known for his work on political philosophy and justice. Rawls advocated for a theory of justice based on principles of fairness and equality, particularly through his concept of the original position and the veil of ignorance.


Would John Rawls argue that it is unjust to give some people more opportunity than others?

Yes, John Rawls would argue that it is unjust to give some people more opportunity than others. He believed in the principle of justice as fairness, which requires that inequalities in wealth and opportunity should only be permitted if they benefit the least advantaged members of society. Unequal opportunities that systematically disadvantage certain groups would violate Rawls' concept of justice.


What is thesis for Rawls theory of Justice?

John Rawls' theory of justice, known as "justice as fairness," argues that principles of justice should be determined through a thought experiment called the "original position," where individuals choose principles of justice behind a "veil of ignorance" that obscures their own circumstances. Rawls believes that in this hypothetical situation, individuals would agree upon principles that maximize equal basic liberties for all and provide fair opportunities for everyone.


Who are the prominent philosophers?

Many people point to Kierkegaard and Nietzsche as the two most prominent philosophers of existentialism. My first answer was incorrect. I was thinking about existentialist philosophers. To correct this I propose that Aristotle and Plato are two of the most prominent philosophers.