From a " Darwinian " " perspective " ( perspective is a term not used in science, but usually social science/humanities ) the question makes no sense. Populations evolve, individuals are selected. If you can not get this simple concept evolution and evolutionary theory will make no sense to you and you will continue to ask ill posed questions.
Your question is directly analogous to asking something like....
" How much does the color blue weigh? "
A matter of perspective. By evolutionary theory, the egg came first from something that was almost, but not quite, a chicken. By creationism, the chicken was created by God, and thus eggs came after that.
That depends on your beliefs on evolution. In my opinion, the material egg came first, seeing as the chicken was not a chicken when it was in the egg. Some previous creature had offspring with mutated genes, which grew from in the egg and eventually became what we today call the "chicken".
Preferably, the hen came first but then came the chicken. So biologically speaking the hen came first but 4 out of 10 chances, scientists believe that the chicken came first, so they are coming up with various results.
This question is more of a philosophical debate. From an evolutionary standpoint, it is believed that the egg came first, as the genetic mutation necessary for a chicken to hatch must have first occurred in an egg. However, from a biblical perspective, it is said that God created the animals, including chickens, fully formed.
the chicken came first just like Adam and eve came before the baby.
obviously its the egg! How else would the chike- oh wait... A circle has no beginning.
The church came first before the chicken.
Technically the ancestors of the chicken came first.
A matter of perspective. By evolutionary theory, the egg came first from something that was almost, but not quite, a chicken. By creationism, the chicken was created by God, and thus eggs came after that.
That depends on your beliefs on evolution. In my opinion, the material egg came first, seeing as the chicken was not a chicken when it was in the egg. Some previous creature had offspring with mutated genes, which grew from in the egg and eventually became what we today call the "chicken".
I will clear up the question:"What came first, the chicken or the egg?"You are correct, the chicken came first.
There is much debate about whether the chicken or the egg came first, but both came before KFC.
Preferably, the hen came first but then came the chicken. So biologically speaking the hen came first but 4 out of 10 chances, scientists believe that the chicken came first, so they are coming up with various results.
No matter whether you adhere to the generally-accepted Darwinian theories orto a strictly creationist ideology, the earth came first. (What would we stand on?)
domesticated chicken
This question is more of a philosophical debate. From an evolutionary standpoint, it is believed that the egg came first, as the genetic mutation necessary for a chicken to hatch must have first occurred in an egg. However, from a biblical perspective, it is said that God created the animals, including chickens, fully formed.
the chicken came first just like Adam and eve came before the baby.