Something is accepted as science through a process of rigorous testing, peer review, and validation of evidence. Scientific ideas must be supported by empirical data, reproducible experiments, and logical reasoning in order to be considered valid within the scientific community.
When something is ethical, it means that it is morally right and conforms to accepted principles of right and wrong behavior.
Science cannot really PROVE anything. If you consider the arguments of, for example, the 18th century philosopher David Hume, then you will see that science cannot prove things as it consistently relies on induction to form conclusions and induction does not say that something is definitely the result of something else, only that it could be or is likely or even appears at this moment to be the only explanation. Therefore, if we put this belief into the original question "Can science prove something that does not exist?", both yes and no can be argued. No because science cannot prove anything, therefore, it cannot prove something that does exist and it cannot prove something that does not exist. Yes because if you do still believe that science can prove that existing things do exist, you will believe that it can prove that non-exisiting also exist because obviously if a mistake is made to come to this false conclusion, you (the person who has found such a result) will not know the mistake has occured and will not question it if you have done everything right according to the procedures for proving things, because you believe that if you have followed such procedures then you must have proven it because that is the way you believe science works. A complicated discussion really, depends what you believe about the reliabity of 'fact' and the nature of 'proof'. it's true the science is can really prove any thing.=]
Science is the systematic study of the natural world to gain knowledge, while technology involves applying that knowledge to create products and processes. Science drives technological advancements by providing a deeper understanding of natural phenomena, which can then be harnessed to develop new technologies. In turn, technology can enable scientific research by providing tools and techniques to collect data, analyze findings, and simulate complex systems.
Kuhn believed that science progresses through shifts in paradigms, where accepted beliefs change dramatically, while Popper argued that science advances through falsification of theories and continuous testing. Kuhn emphasized the importance of consensus and normal science within a paradigm, while Popper focused on the critical testing of hypotheses to improve scientific knowledge.
Doing something unethical means acting in a way that goes against moral standards, such as lying, cheating, or harming others for personal gain. It can involve violating laws, regulations, or accepted social norms, and often results in harm to individuals, society, or the environment.
In science 'Theory' Refers to the best hypothesis, accepted as true until something better comes along.
It means that something is accepted, or that you accepted something .
yes there is not absolute answer in science it can either be accepted or not accepted not proven
what is another word for something accepted as true
The science of classifying organisms and assigning them universally accepted names is known as taxonomy.
To be confirmed means to be accepted. Something is confirmed when it is accepted.
Something like planets or germs or a scientist do something you like about science!
You need to prove something for it to consider a fact. Example, you have a study. You need to defend it by proving things that makes your study be accepted. You need to support your study.
People who are too bright and advanced to be accepted even in science.
Not many knew about them at the time.
A value accepted by scientists after many experiments and tests.
In science, a theory is, by definition, proven and accepted as fact.