answersLogoWhite

0

How Does Locke's regard for the senses differ from Descartes

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Philosophy

How does Locke's regard from the senses differ from descartes?

Locke's essentially believed that the senses are responsible for all of our experiences, whereas Descartes believed that although the senses played a crucial role in our discovery of truth, the senses could not be trusted.


Why are the senses not to be trusted according to Descartes?

Descartes believed that the senses are not to be trusted because they can sometimes deceive us. He argued that illusions, dreams, and other sensory experiences can lead us to false perceptions of reality. Since our senses can be unreliable, Descartes advocated for relying on reason and intellect to arrive at truth.


Are the senses trustworthy on account of descartes philosophy?

Descartes believed that our senses can sometimes deceive us, leading to doubts about the reliability of sense perception. He argued that our senses can be tricked by illusions or dreams, suggesting they are not always trustworthy. However, Descartes also acknowledged that our senses can provide valuable information about the physical world and are generally reliable in many everyday situations.


Why Descartes does not trust his senses completely?

Descartes does not trust his senses completely because he believes they can be deceptive or misleading. He argues that our senses can sometimes provide us with false perceptions and illusions, which can lead to doubt about the true nature of reality. As a result, Descartes believes that it is necessary to rely on reason and logic to discern the truth.


Did Descartes believe that your senses could deceive us?

Yes, Descartes believed that the information provided by our senses could sometimes deceive us. He argued that because the senses are fallible and can be influenced by external factors, we cannot always trust them to provide accurate information about the external world.

Related Questions

How does Locke's regard from the senses differ from descartes?

Locke's essentially believed that the senses are responsible for all of our experiences, whereas Descartes believed that although the senses played a crucial role in our discovery of truth, the senses could not be trusted.


Why are the senses not to be trusted according to Descartes?

Descartes believed that the senses are not to be trusted because they can sometimes deceive us. He argued that illusions, dreams, and other sensory experiences can lead us to false perceptions of reality. Since our senses can be unreliable, Descartes advocated for relying on reason and intellect to arrive at truth.


Are the senses trustworthy on account of descartes philosophy?

Descartes believed that our senses can sometimes deceive us, leading to doubts about the reliability of sense perception. He argued that our senses can be tricked by illusions or dreams, suggesting they are not always trustworthy. However, Descartes also acknowledged that our senses can provide valuable information about the physical world and are generally reliable in many everyday situations.


Why Descartes does not trust his senses completely?

Descartes does not trust his senses completely because he believes they can be deceptive or misleading. He argues that our senses can sometimes provide us with false perceptions and illusions, which can lead to doubt about the true nature of reality. As a result, Descartes believes that it is necessary to rely on reason and logic to discern the truth.


Did Descartes believe that your senses could deceive us?

Yes, Descartes believed that the information provided by our senses could sometimes deceive us. He argued that because the senses are fallible and can be influenced by external factors, we cannot always trust them to provide accurate information about the external world.


Do you need senses to be a thinking thing?

The concept of a thinking thing, as introduced by René Descartes, does not inherently require senses. Descartes argued that the mind (thinking thing) can exist independently of the body, suggesting that thought is separate from sensory perception. Therefore, senses are not necessary for something to be considered a thinking thing.


Which of your five senses do you regard as the least reliable?

Taste


Descartes and the evil genius?

Descartes creates the evil genius in an attempt to throw everything that he thinks he knows into question. The evil genius has god-like power that he uses to deceive Descartes. Descartes cannot disprove the existence of such a creature. You cannot trust your thoughts in such a scenario, thus Descartes cannot be certain that any of the information he gets from his senses, his memories, his thoughts, or his beliefs is real.


What does Descartes wax example proves?

Descartes is trying to show that the information you get from your senses is meaningless without your mind. He wants to distinguish between 'accidental' features and what truly distinguishes a thing. His conclusion is that it is incorrect to think that what you perceive with your senses is stronger than what you understand in your mind, because the senses are not what give you the correct information.


What did Rene Descartes fear?

Rene Descartes feared being misled by false beliefs or opinions. He was particularly concerned about being deceived by his senses, which led him to develop his method of doubt in his philosophical work.


What reasons does descartes give for doubting everything?

Descartes doubts everything because he believes that our senses can deceive us, leading to false beliefs. He also questions the reliability of our thoughts and reasoning abilities. By doubting everything, Descartes aims to find a foundation of certainty that cannot be doubted.


How does the senses makes descartes to think that he exist?

Descartes' famous statement "I think, therefore I am" implies that the act of thinking proves one's existence. He argued that even if all senses were deceiving him, the very act of doubting and questioning his own existence was evidence that he must exist as a thinking being. Therefore, he concluded that his existence as a thinking thing was undeniable.