answersLogoWhite

0

john Locke believed that man was for the most part happy, peaceful, and wants to have a harmonious relationship with others. His view of human nature was very different from Thomas Hobbes who believed that most humans were self serving and existed for their own benefit.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Philosophy

How did John Locke view human nature and government?

John Locke viewed human nature as inherently rational and capable of self-governance. He believed that individuals have natural rights to life, liberty, and property, and that government should protect these rights. Locke also emphasized the idea of a social contract, where individuals consent to be governed in exchange for protection of their natural rights.


What was John Locke's view of human nature?

John Locke believed that human nature is characterized by reason, tolerance, and the capacity for self-improvement. He argued that individuals are born as blank slates (tabula rasa) and are molded by their experiences and environment. Locke emphasized the importance of individual rights, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness.


What following best describes John Locke and view of human nature?

John Locke believed that human nature was characterized by individual rights, reason, and self-interest. He argued that individuals were born with certain natural rights, such as life, liberty, and property, and that government's primary role was to protect these rights. Locke's ideas laid the foundation for modern liberal democracy and influenced the concept of individual rights and limited government.


What was John Locke's view of basic human nature?

In opposition to Thomas Hobbes, who saw human beings as self-serving and existing in a state of nature in a short and brutish existence, Locke believed that man was basically peaceful, happy, and benevolent, and naturally seeks a beneficial relationship to his fellows. Locke's social contract theory of government was an outgrowth of this optimistic view of human nature.


What was John Locke's take on human nature compared to Hobbs'?

Hobbs: people are basically evil and need society (a strong dictator) to control them and harness them in, otherwise their lives are "nasty, brutish, and short" Locke: people are basically good, and join in a society to highlight their potential rather than mitigate their evils

Related Questions

What is Locke' view of human nature?

The philosopher john Locke held a different ,more positive of human nature he believed that people could Learn from experience and improve themselves


What is John Locke for?

john Locke is known for his view on Essay Concerning Human Understanding.


What is john Locke known for?

John Locke is known for his view on Essay Concerning Human Understanding.


How did Locke view human nature?

john Locke believed that man was for the most part happy, peaceful, and wants to have a harmonious relationship with others. His view of human nature was very different from Thomas Hobbes who believed that most humans were self serving and existed for their own benefit.


How did John Locke view human nature and government?

John Locke viewed human nature as inherently rational and capable of self-governance. He believed that individuals have natural rights to life, liberty, and property, and that government should protect these rights. Locke also emphasized the idea of a social contract, where individuals consent to be governed in exchange for protection of their natural rights.


What was John Locke's view of human nature?

John Locke believed that human nature is characterized by reason, tolerance, and the capacity for self-improvement. He argued that individuals are born as blank slates (tabula rasa) and are molded by their experiences and environment. Locke emphasized the importance of individual rights, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness.


Which statement best describes John Locke's view of human nature?

(Apex) Humans are neither good nor evil, but share a set of natural rights and needs.


What following best describes John Locke and view of human nature?

John Locke believed that human nature was characterized by individual rights, reason, and self-interest. He argued that individuals were born with certain natural rights, such as life, liberty, and property, and that government's primary role was to protect these rights. Locke's ideas laid the foundation for modern liberal democracy and influenced the concept of individual rights and limited government.


What was John Locke's view of basic human nature?

In opposition to Thomas Hobbes, who saw human beings as self-serving and existing in a state of nature in a short and brutish existence, Locke believed that man was basically peaceful, happy, and benevolent, and naturally seeks a beneficial relationship to his fellows. Locke's social contract theory of government was an outgrowth of this optimistic view of human nature.


How did Thomas Hobbes and John Locke differ in their views of the role of government?

Thomas Hobbes and john Locke had very different views of human nature. The basic difference between the two of them is that Hobbes had a rather negative view of human nature while Locke had a much more positive view of human nature. You can see this difference in the kinds of political systems they each advocated. Hobbes, thought that only a monarch, a "leviathan" of a power, could keep people in check due to their inherent badness. By contrast, Locke thought that people were good enough to be able to govern themselves. He thought that the people were good enough that they would be able to set up representative governments that would maintain a stable society


What was Locke's view of human nature?

Humans are neither good nor evil, but share a set of natural rights and needs.


What was John Locke's take on human nature compared to Hobbs'?

Hobbs: people are basically evil and need society (a strong dictator) to control them and harness them in, otherwise their lives are "nasty, brutish, and short" Locke: people are basically good, and join in a society to highlight their potential rather than mitigate their evils