Confucianism supported individuals by emphasizing ethical behavior, the importance of education, and maintaining social harmony through respect for hierarchy and tradition. For rulers, Confucianism promoted benevolent leadership, ethical governance, and good moral example. Within societies, Confucianism fostered a sense of duty, filial piety, and social roles, contributing to stability and order.
A philosophical advocate is someone who promotes and defends a particular philosophical idea, principle, or perspective. They engage in discussions, debates, and writings to support and spread their philosophical beliefs.
A philosophical proof is a logical argument that aims to establish the truth of a statement or proposition. It is used to support arguments in various fields of study by providing a rational and systematic justification for a particular claim or position. Philosophical proofs often rely on principles of logic, reasoning, and evidence to demonstrate the validity of an argument and persuade others to accept its conclusions.
A philosophical argument should involve presenting a clear thesis or claim, providing reasons or evidence to support the claim, addressing potential objections or counterarguments, and drawing logical conclusions based on the premises presented. It should also aim to be coherent, well-structured, and engage with relevant philosophical concepts or theories.
Yes, science can be used to evaluate philosophy by providing empirical evidence and logical reasoning to support or refute philosophical ideas.
During the Enlightenment, rulers needed to balance their philosophical goals, such as promoting reason, individual rights, and equality, with practical concerns about maintaining support from the nobility, military, and clergy. Failure to maintain this balance could lead to resistance, rebellion, or loss of power. Rulers often relied on patronage, diplomacy, and propaganda to navigate these challenges.
Confucianism lost all official support.
A philosophical advocate is someone who promotes and defends a particular philosophical idea, principle, or perspective. They engage in discussions, debates, and writings to support and spread their philosophical beliefs.
It depends on what society you are talking about. Some societies, especially Asian societies, are very family-focused, while others such as American societies tend to support more independence.
Slaves do not increase personal support. In fact, the use of slaves contributes to the exploitation and abuse of individuals and goes against principles of equality and human rights. It is unethical and illegal to own slaves in most societies.
rulers dic
Hunter-gatherer societies did not have a surplus of resources to support specialized roles due to their nomadic lifestyle and reliance on foraging. In contrast, agricultural societies had a more stable food supply, allowing individuals to specialize in certain tasks like farming or crafting. Specialization in agriculture led to increased productivity and economic development, shaping the structure of society.
The Atlantic slave trade only positively affected those in West African societies who were involved in the trade itself, otherwise it was a disaster. The people who kidnapped individuals to sell them into slavery benefited financially.
Democritus did not have experimental evidence to support his idea of the atom. Instead, his idea was based on philosophical reasoning and speculation.
Carrying capacity describes the largest number of individuals that an environment can support.
the play too much soccer
Someone who is a philosophical naturalist would say that nature is all there is.... because there is no sound evidence to support a belief in the supernatural or the paranormal. Epistemology leads one to that conclusion.
A philosophical proof is a logical argument that aims to establish the truth of a statement or proposition. It is used to support arguments in various fields of study by providing a rational and systematic justification for a particular claim or position. Philosophical proofs often rely on principles of logic, reasoning, and evidence to demonstrate the validity of an argument and persuade others to accept its conclusions.