Hobbes believed liberty was the absence of external interference in one's actions, Locke viewed it as the protection of natural rights and freedoms, Rousseau saw it as submission to the general will of society, and Montesquieu emphasized the importance of a system of checks and balances to protect individual liberties.
Hobbes defines human nature as inherently self-interested and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argues that in a state of nature, without a governing authority, humans would ultimately compete and conflict with one another in a war of all against all.
He explains liberty as the basic things that he thinks everyone should be able to do. Freedom of conscience: believe what you like as long as it does not harm others Freedom of life: you canarrange your life in the way that you want without having to justify it to others Freedom of association: as long as the reason for meeting is not to harm others
John Locke's philosophy is characterized by the belief in natural rights, the social contract theory, and the idea of tabula rasa, which suggests that individuals are born with a blank slate and are shaped by their experiences. He also emphasized the importance of individual liberty, property rights, and the idea that government should be based on the consent of the governed.
Teenagers may define responsibility as being accountable for their actions, decisions, and obligations. They see it as taking ownership of their tasks and commitments, as well as understanding the consequences of their choices.
The question assumes that it is difficult to define philosophy. That's not necessarily true.Etymologically, a "philosopher" is a "lover of wisdom." In other words, a philosopher is someone seriously trying to become wise. That's not difficult to understand.If the concept of wisdom were difficult to define, then it would be difficult to define the goal of philosophy. If the concept of wisdom were not difficult to define, then it would not be difficult to define the goal of philosophy.Whether or not wisdom is difficult to define depends upon the nature of wisdom, which is controversial. Anyone who is serious about the nature of wisdom needs to articulate what he or she thinks is a sound argument concerning its nature. Whatever argument is advanced, it will be attacked to see if it stands up to examination.Therefore, it may or may not be difficult to define the nature of philosophy, because doing so depends upon understanding the nature of wisdom. If wisdom is simple, as it may be, then so will be the definition of philosophy. If it is not the case that wisdom is simple, then neither will be the definition of philosophy.In short, the nature of philosophy is itself controversial. That itself may be sufficient for it to be classified as difficult to define. ----
Montesquieu defines corrupt government as one that deviates from the principles of justice and liberty, prioritizing the interests of the rulers over the well-being of the governed. He argues that corruption arises when those in power abuse their authority, leading to tyranny and oppression. In his view, a government becomes corrupt when it lacks a system of checks and balances, allowing for the concentration of power and the erosion of civic freedoms. Ultimately, Montesquieu emphasizes the importance of virtue and moral integrity among leaders to prevent corruption.
Hobbes said that the origin of private property is also the origin of the state. Hobbes stated that property exists only after the creation of a sovereign power capable of enforcing contracts. He also kept to the idea that the subjects have no property rights at all against the sovereign.
Liberty is the option of having the right to defend oneself against the government.
The three inalienable rights.
Liberty is to faction what air is to fire. James Madison says this in Federalist #10. It pretty much means like if you were to remove liberty would be to remove the air, which is essential to life.
Beliefs and rules that are important to a political party or person, such as equality, liberty and tolerance of diversity
Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Hobbes defines equality as the natural state of individuals being equally capable of killing one another, leading to a state of nature characterized by constant fear and competition for power. In this state, there is no inherent hierarchy or authority, and individuals must come together to establish a social contract to avoid the chaos of the state of nature.
He meant to define what people would be like in a state of nature (pre-society). They would be independent and ape-like with simple needs that are easily met.
Beliefs and rules that are important to a political party or person, such as equality, liberty and tolerance of diversity
Hobbes defines human nature as inherently self-interested and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argues that in a state of nature, without a governing authority, humans would ultimately compete and conflict with one another in a war of all against all.
Benjamin Franklin seemed to define his idea of breaking free as the ability to express himself and his goals openly. He felt that the American Dream of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness applied to his own life.